【Crypto World】Recently, the topic of energy and Bitcoin has once again become popular. Some viewpoints suggest that “energy is the true currency,” which many industry insiders interpret as an endorsement of Bitcoin’s proof-of-work mechanism—after all, Bitcoin is closely linked to energy, and energy cannot be arbitrarily overissued.
Interestingly, this viewpoint has existed in the community for a long time. Several years ago, some emphasized the relationship between Bitcoin and energy, believing it to be the foundation of its store of value properties. However, due to concerns over energy consumption, some previous supporters changed their stance, and their attitudes shifted accordingly.
But the latest data offers a different perspective. According to Cambridge University’s latest 2025 research report, the proportion of sustainable energy used in Bitcoin mining has exceeded 50%. What does this mean? The mining industry is undergoing a “green transformation.”
From a controversial topic to an industry trend, the story of energy and Bitcoin continues.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockImposter
· 11h ago
Green turnaround? Haha, is it really a turnaround or just data fabrication? But that 50% figure does seem a bit interesting.
---
Those who previously criticized mining for wasting energy should be eating their words now haha.
---
I've never really understood the logic that energy = currency. Can someone explain it to me?
---
Can we trust the Cambridge University report? It feels like their data has been changing over the past few years.
---
As expected, they still rely on sustainable energy to whitewash. Otherwise, they really can't attract new people.
---
Wait, is it true that over 50% of energy is sustainable? I feel like that's a bit exaggerated.
---
Environmentalists should have no grounds to argue now, although I think they will still have opinions.
---
The promised green Bitcoin is here, but the price remains the same. No matter how green the energy is, it can't change the cost of mining.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 11h ago
Green mining exceeds 50%, now those environmental police should shut up... But on the other hand, could the data be manipulated, and can we trust research reports like this?
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 11h ago
50% of sustainable energy? Now those who criticize Bitcoin for its energy consumption should shut up, right? Facepalm.
---
Switching to green energy sounds good, but how do we verify the actual data? We still need market validation.
---
I've understood the logic that energy equals currency a long time ago. Now there's finally data to support it.
---
Honestly, I'm a bit surprised. I didn't expect it to surpass 50% so quickly. It seems the mining industry is really iterating.
---
It's another data point from Cambridge University. This time, it's good news, haha.
---
What can the opponents say now? This turn of events is quite interesting.
---
Sustainable energy accounting for over 50%? I need to reevaluate this sector.
---
Environmental protection is becoming increasingly important. If you don't keep up, you'll be eliminated.
---
The combination of proof of work and green energy is indeed quite solid.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatcher
· 11h ago
To be honest, green mining was heavily criticized a couple of years ago, but now that the data is out, no one is saying anything anymore.
Those who were bearish before must be feeling awkward now. The energy-based logic has actually always been valid.
50% is not enough, but at least the direction is right, and we won't have to be constantly dissed by environmentalists anymore.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 11h ago
50% is still a bit low, gotta keep pushing, or else it's easy to be criticized.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 11h ago
50%啊,看来那群FUD狗真得闭嘴了,绿能转身这波确实没吹牛
---
Energy = Currency logic has long been accepted, PoW is the essence of hard currency
---
Just over 50%? I thought it would be higher, but this trend has indeed reversed
---
What about those who previously criticized Bitcoin for high energy consumption? Now they should eat shit haha
---
Green mining should have come earlier, is it a bit slow now that it's only about half?
Bitcoin mining's "green turnaround": sustainable energy accounts for over 50%
【Crypto World】Recently, the topic of energy and Bitcoin has once again become popular. Some viewpoints suggest that “energy is the true currency,” which many industry insiders interpret as an endorsement of Bitcoin’s proof-of-work mechanism—after all, Bitcoin is closely linked to energy, and energy cannot be arbitrarily overissued.
Interestingly, this viewpoint has existed in the community for a long time. Several years ago, some emphasized the relationship between Bitcoin and energy, believing it to be the foundation of its store of value properties. However, due to concerns over energy consumption, some previous supporters changed their stance, and their attitudes shifted accordingly.
But the latest data offers a different perspective. According to Cambridge University’s latest 2025 research report, the proportion of sustainable energy used in Bitcoin mining has exceeded 50%. What does this mean? The mining industry is undergoing a “green transformation.”
From a controversial topic to an industry trend, the story of energy and Bitcoin continues.