#数字资产市场洞察 Court documents reveal an old story that once again amplifies the "background" of Bitcoin. Records show that a well-known individual donated $850,000 to MIT, which indirectly supported the core development of Bitcoin; even more interestingly, he discussed Bitcoin privately with the co-founder of Tether, the former U.S. Treasury Secretary, and others.
What does this reflect? There has never been such a thing as pure "grassroots innovation." In Bitcoin's development trajectory, the participation and influence of capital and power circles have never been absent. The big players have been strategizing all along; outsiders just can't see through the game.
But this is also the reason Bitcoin has come this far. When internal power structures start to value something, their space for survival actually expands. Retail investors don't need to over-interpret these historical details; the key is to understand reality: Bitcoin's market landscape has already taken shape, and individual forces find it difficult to sway the overall trend.
The truly effective approach is simple—hold spot assets and avoid over-trading. Keep a close eye on information that directly impacts prices, such as supply-side and policy developments. Discover genuine market signals; this is more reliable than chasing hype stories. The survival rule of the crypto market is straightforward: see through appearances, grasp the essence.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BrokeBeans
· 11h ago
Ha, it's the same old story. The big shots have long been playing us for fools.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarker
· 11h ago
ngl this "bitcoin has powerful friends" revelation is like... yeah no shit? well technically speaking, every monetary system needs institutional legitimacy to scale. imagine if people thought their money was just some random hobby project lol
Reply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 11h ago
Damn, I've long known that there's no such thing as purely civilian. When the big shots are playing chess, we just obediently take the spot assets and sit back to win.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 11h ago
850,000 USD is nothing; the big shots have already filled their chips long ago, while we're still here studying their stories.
#数字资产市场洞察 Court documents reveal an old story that once again amplifies the "background" of Bitcoin. Records show that a well-known individual donated $850,000 to MIT, which indirectly supported the core development of Bitcoin; even more interestingly, he discussed Bitcoin privately with the co-founder of Tether, the former U.S. Treasury Secretary, and others.
What does this reflect? There has never been such a thing as pure "grassroots innovation." In Bitcoin's development trajectory, the participation and influence of capital and power circles have never been absent. The big players have been strategizing all along; outsiders just can't see through the game.
But this is also the reason Bitcoin has come this far. When internal power structures start to value something, their space for survival actually expands. Retail investors don't need to over-interpret these historical details; the key is to understand reality: Bitcoin's market landscape has already taken shape, and individual forces find it difficult to sway the overall trend.
The truly effective approach is simple—hold spot assets and avoid over-trading. Keep a close eye on information that directly impacts prices, such as supply-side and policy developments. Discover genuine market signals; this is more reliable than chasing hype stories. The survival rule of the crypto market is straightforward: see through appearances, grasp the essence.