After reviewing a research institution's report on Sei, it mentioned a phenomenon—Sei's TVL is declining.
Honestly, I had previously noted in data that "TVL ≠ everything," but I didn't elaborate back then. Now I want to discuss this issue.
The key point is: if you're still evaluating a new public chain like Sei using the traditional DeFi framework, you're probably missing the mark. TVL is just one dimension; using it as the sole metric to judge the ecosystem's vitality is like only looking at trading volume to assess an exchange's activity—it's incomplete.
What is the current market situation? Almost all public chains are experiencing a decline in TVL. But this doesn't mean the ecosystem is dead; it simply indicates a fact: the sheer locked-in value is no longer the only standard to measure a chain's health.
What truly matters are soft indicators like user stickiness, on-chain activity, and application diversity. Sei has its own approach in these areas.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketMonk
· 4h ago
Cry when TVL drops? Come on, this old and outdated metric should have been discarded long ago.
Sei's real strength is in trading activity. You guys who only look at TVL need to catch up.
Staring at TVL decline every day, you're really missing the point. Wake up, everyone.
Activity is the key; TVL is no longer reliable.
It's 2024 and you're still using TVL to evaluate public chains? Bro, your thinking is too outdated.
Isn't it just a TVL plunge? Why single out Sei for criticism? Your perspective is too narrow.
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHunter
· 5h ago
Is a drop in TVL just going to be called death? Laughs, this old framework should have been discarded long ago
---
It's that same old thing, staring at TVL every day, might as well not do investment research
---
Whether Sei has real users is the key, TVL is too superficial a metric
---
All public chains' TVL is dropping, and investment research institutions still focusing on this need to reevaluate themselves
---
Soft indicators are the core, this should have been a consensus long ago, yet some still use outdated frameworks for evaluation
---
User stickiness > TVL, there's really nothing to argue about, the market should have seen it this way long ago
---
It sounds like Sei does have ideas, but it depends on whether on-chain activity can stay steady
---
Seeing too many of these reports will only cause retail investors to follow the trend and cut losses
---
Activity is the lifeline; investment research reports that only look at locked-up volume should be discounted
---
Sei is really making an effort in application diversity, which is much smarter than just piling up TVL
After reviewing a research institution's report on Sei, it mentioned a phenomenon—Sei's TVL is declining.
Honestly, I had previously noted in data that "TVL ≠ everything," but I didn't elaborate back then. Now I want to discuss this issue.
The key point is: if you're still evaluating a new public chain like Sei using the traditional DeFi framework, you're probably missing the mark. TVL is just one dimension; using it as the sole metric to judge the ecosystem's vitality is like only looking at trading volume to assess an exchange's activity—it's incomplete.
What is the current market situation? Almost all public chains are experiencing a decline in TVL. But this doesn't mean the ecosystem is dead; it simply indicates a fact: the sheer locked-in value is no longer the only standard to measure a chain's health.
What truly matters are soft indicators like user stickiness, on-chain activity, and application diversity. Sei has its own approach in these areas.