During the holiday season, a significant research report emerged in the crypto industry. An authoritative crypto research institution released an in-depth report analyzing a key project that is reconstructing on-chain finance—Falcon Finance.



This is not just another meme coin hype. What Falcon Finance is doing is more fundamental and foundational: building a universal collateral infrastructure. Simply put, it aims to become the "financial skeleton" of the entire DeFi ecosystem.

Looking back at the development dilemma of DeFi, it becomes clear why this is so critical. The current on-chain ecosystem is markedly fragmented—users collateralize and borrow on Protocol A, participate in liquidity mining on Protocol B, hedge risks on Protocol C. Each operation requires separate collateralization, decentralized deployment of funds, leading to repeated locking of liquidity, significantly reduced efficiency, and an inability to share risks across protocols.

Falcon Finance’s solution is straightforward: connect these isolated islands and build a unified, cross-protocol collateral layer.

For users, the benefits are obvious. One collateralization can unlock credit limits across multiple scenarios—used for borrowing, mining for yields, or hedging market risks—doubling the efficiency of capital utilization. For protocols, this infrastructure enables efficient liquidity flow within the ecosystem and better risk management.

From an industry perspective, this signifies that DeFi is evolving from "siloed operations" to "infrastructure co-creation." If projects like Falcon Finance can mature and be implemented successfully, the rules of on-chain applications may be rewritten in the next market cycle.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasGoblinvip
· 37m ago
It's another infrastructure narrative, sounds good but can it really be implemented? But I have to admit, solving DeFi fragmentation is definitely something that needs to be done, and Falcon truly succeeds if it can connect these isolated islands. Wait, is this another prelude to cutting leeks again? Suddenly I remember Lido said the same back then... and what was the result? Let's wait and see the actual product. These types of infrastructure projects either become the next Uniswap or fall into obscurity; there's no middle ground. Honestly, it feels a bit overhyped by marketing... But if it can truly solve liquidity efficiency issues, this could be a game-changer. Whether it's reliable or not still depends on who is using it; having real interaction data is the real key.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDayvip
· 4h ago
It's another infrastructure narrative. It looks good, but we have to wait and see when it will actually be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfervip
· 4h ago
Another new concept to cut leeks? Tired of the phrase about connecting isolated islands.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 4h ago
It sounds like another project aiming to change DeFi. To be honest, I'm a bit tired of hearing that haha. Another cross-protocol infrastructure. Will it really be usable this time? The name Falcon sounds very "flying," but reality is often harsh. One collateral for multiple scenarios, doubling efficiency? Let's see if it can really survive first. DeFi fragmentation is indeed troublesome, but connecting isolated islands is no easy task. Liquidity interoperability sounds great, but risk hedging seems even more complicated. Reports from authoritative institutions are not necessarily reliable. Last year, how many "reformers" like this died? I also saw the holiday hotspots, but I prefer to wait and see. From a purely infrastructure perspective, this setup is definitely a notch above MEME coins. Can we wait until it officially launches before hyping it? Right now, it's all just PPT.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWalletvip
· 4h ago
Here we go again with this set of financial frameworks, it sounds impressive, but can it actually be implemented? Wait, there really are in-depth reports from institutions backing this up, then it’s a different story. Fragmentation is indeed annoying; redeploying funds every time is just too stupid. If it can truly be used across multiple scenarios with one collateral, then it’s worth paying attention to. But while I remain optimistic, we still need to see the product speak for itself. This round is about infrastructure co-construction, which is really a far cry from those meme concepts before. By the way, the name Falcon is pretty good, but I’m not sure if the team is reliable.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_traumavip
· 4h ago
Another infrastructure narrative. Will this one come to fruition? I've heard too many such promises in recent years.
View OriginalReply0
BearHuggervip
· 4h ago
Another research report... This time it's Falcon? To be honest, I'm a bit tired. It feels like I have to listen to the "Rebuilding DeFi" story every holiday.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)