Recent regulatory movements have been frequent, and many people are starting to worry whether their projects will become the next targets of regulation. But if you look closely at market trends, you'll find that some protocols have already devised countermeasures.
The root of the problem lies in differing mindsets. Traditional protocols often resist or evade regulation, turning the system into a black box operation. The new generation of solutions takes a different approach — not avoiding rules, but reinterpreting them through code.
What is the core logic? Modular compliance architecture.
At the technical level, these protocols are equipped with intelligent filtering mechanisms. Need privacy protection? Zero-knowledge proof technology ensures transaction details remain fully private. Need to meet regional requirements? Anti-money laundering (AML) compliance plugins can be optionally integrated, allowing users to choose freely. In other words, the system retains its technical attributes while offering compliance flexibility.
From on-chain data, this approach has already been validated by the market — over 65% of protocol liquidity has shifted to compliant channels. This is not a small figure. What does it mean? Regulators no longer see an unordered ecosystem but a transparent, controllable, and traceable technical architecture.
Looking at it from another perspective, the real risk does not lie in the technology itself but in attitude. Those attempting to resist or evade are more likely to become targets. Conversely, actively embracing frameworks and achieving compliance through technology are precisely redefining the sustainable development model of the Web3 ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
quietly_staking
· 4h ago
It sounds a bit too idealistic. Are there really projects that obedient in reality?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfer
· 4h ago
Hmm... Is the compliance plugin optional to mount? Sounds good, but I always feel something's off.
Actually, it's just a new routine where both Party A and Party B can get along peacefully.
By the way, are there really that many projects genuinely embracing the rules, or is it just a good-looking posture?
Wait, how is that 65% calculated? Can on-chain data really be that clear?
It feels like the crypto world is always performing the act of "we've improved," and when the next black swan event comes, the true nature will be revealed.
However, the idea of modularity is indeed fresh; it's much better than just playing hide and seek.
View OriginalReply0
OPsychology
· 4h ago
Compromise is a dead end; I've heard this talk too many times.
Let me see where that 65% data comes from...
Isn't it just a shell change to continue cutting?
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignSteve
· 4h ago
That's right, proactively embracing compliance is actually safer. Those projects that hide and conceal will eventually run into trouble.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 4h ago
To be honest, this set of logic sounds good, but I'm still a bit skeptical. Where does the 65% figure come from? It feels a bit inflated.
Still, the old saying goes, projects that actively comply with regulations will eventually be cut off. The more you cooperate with regulation, the more you're being exploited.
But on the other hand, those protocols still resisting are indeed having a tough time these days.
It should have been done a long time ago to avoid constant worry.
Old cats burn their whiskers; the real big players have already quietly shifted, they just don't make a sound.
This is probably the biggest narrative shift this year, from avoidance to embrace. Let's see who laughs last.
Recent regulatory movements have been frequent, and many people are starting to worry whether their projects will become the next targets of regulation. But if you look closely at market trends, you'll find that some protocols have already devised countermeasures.
The root of the problem lies in differing mindsets. Traditional protocols often resist or evade regulation, turning the system into a black box operation. The new generation of solutions takes a different approach — not avoiding rules, but reinterpreting them through code.
What is the core logic? Modular compliance architecture.
At the technical level, these protocols are equipped with intelligent filtering mechanisms. Need privacy protection? Zero-knowledge proof technology ensures transaction details remain fully private. Need to meet regional requirements? Anti-money laundering (AML) compliance plugins can be optionally integrated, allowing users to choose freely. In other words, the system retains its technical attributes while offering compliance flexibility.
From on-chain data, this approach has already been validated by the market — over 65% of protocol liquidity has shifted to compliant channels. This is not a small figure. What does it mean? Regulators no longer see an unordered ecosystem but a transparent, controllable, and traceable technical architecture.
Looking at it from another perspective, the real risk does not lie in the technology itself but in attitude. Those attempting to resist or evade are more likely to become targets. Conversely, actively embracing frameworks and achieving compliance through technology are precisely redefining the sustainable development model of the Web3 ecosystem.