Price building mainly follows two major paths, each subdivided into three different performance patterns.



**Horizontal accumulation**: The first type requires more than 3 months of sideways consolidation, often accompanied by a deliberate shakeout with a V-shaped rebound before a breakout; the second type is more straightforward—after consolidation, it directly breaks the previous high, accompanied by a surge in volume from previous stacking to a large bullish candle, which usually signals an immediate rise. During this period, the price typically fluctuates within 20%; the third type is the most meticulous—requiring over three months of bottoming out, then a volume breakout above the previous high, followed by a volume contraction pullback to the previous high for support. When volume surges again upward, it often signals distribution.

**Lifting-style accumulation** also divides into three categories: the first is the standard pattern of rising volume and price (volume increases during gains, decreases during declines), with a rise controlled within 40%. After the surge, it retraces to 50% of that gain, then a bullish candle breaking above the previous high signals it’s time to exit; the second is much faster—quick volume and price increase with gains less than 40%, then a rapid return to the starting point with minimal volume, directly initiating the next move (this small-volume start best demonstrates the main force’s control); the third involves a quick surge followed by a volume contraction into a rounded bottom phase, which is a typical shakeout pattern.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
POAPlectionistvip
· 10h ago
Is it the same theory again? Can the veterans really operate precisely based on these levels? I think most of the time, it's just being hammered and confused before they start to sell...
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissentervip
· 10h ago
It's the same theory again... It sounds nice, but in actual operation, the main force can just turn around and wash you out. I've seen too many people get wiped out at the "support level."
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatchervip
· 10h ago
Damn, it's the same theory again... Why do I feel like I'm always cut into the third type?
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomistvip
· 10h ago
actually, statistically speaking... this taxonomy is missing like half the edge cases? per my analysis, conflating volume oscillation patterns with accumulation phases is taxonomically incorrect. let me pull up my spreadsheet real quick but i'm pretty sure the third horizontal pattern is just evolutionary dead-end behavior 💀 data suggests otherwise on that 50% retracement holding thing too ngl
Reply0
SnapshotBotvip
· 10h ago
I've seen all three forms, but the third one—the shrinking volume rounded bottom—is the easiest to get trapped in. Every time I think it's just a shakeout, it's actually already distributing.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGrillervip
· 11h ago
The third type, the shrinking volume arc bottom, is really the easiest to fall into traps. How many people have been washed out without even realizing it?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)