2026-01-08 02:26:55

The old problems of DAOs are definitely familiar—proposal discussions lasting a month, voting taking another half month, and an always mysterious execution timeline. Funds just "lie dormant" in the pool, the community gradually cools down, and most DAOs fall into a cycle of inefficiency.

But one project has broken this rhythm. Lista DAO's recent governance upgrade did something remarkable: it reduced the average execution cycle to 48 hours. Proposals submitted over the weekend, funds allocated by Monday—this speed is truly beyond imagination.

How did they achieve this? Essentially, it's a change in the technical foundation. Multi-signature wallets combined with on-chain automated execution scripts form a combined solution. Every fund movement is automatically verified by smart contracts, ensuring transparency and eliminating delays caused by manual processes. Rumor has it that cross-chain governance features will be launched next quarter, potentially boosting asset scheduling efficiency by another 30%-40%. Imagine this: a governance proposal you submit on Chain A can real-time coordinate assets on Chain B—that's the kind of DAO we should have.

Talking about speed alone isn't enough. What truly retains people is incentives. Lista DAO's community reward pool already holds over 500,000 USDC, distributed based on your token holdings and participation. Voting yields benefits, proposals bring rewards—even small retail investors can feel the value of participation. The higher the engagement, the more direct the income—only such a design can truly stimulate community activity.

Another highlight is the modular design. Governance layers, fund pools, incentive mechanisms—these components can be flexibly combined like LEGO bricks, easily integrating with other DeFi protocols or NFT communities. This composability means DAOs are no longer isolated machines but truly interconnected parts of an ecosystem.

In summary, ListaDAO solves the efficiency issues of traditional DAOs through technology, addresses participation motivation with incentives, and adds ecosystem compatibility. Perhaps this kind of attempt can inspire those DAOs still stuck in an inefficient quagmire.

LISTA-3,44%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GweiObserver

· 21h ago

48-hour execution? That's really tough, but if you dare to bet 500,000 USDC to keep people, then I guess I lose. If cross-chain governance can really be implemented successfully, then the DAO model will truly come to life. It's a bit uncomfortable—another governance token project telling a story. Let's wait and see the on-chain data before making any judgments. By the way, can small retail investors really make money from incentives, or is it just another game for big players? I've heard the modular Lego brick analogy too many times. Can you tell something different next time?

View OriginalReply0

RugDocScientist

· 01-10 00:28

48 hours? I see it's serious this time. DAO projects still arguing should learn from this. Alright, a 500,000 USDC incentive pool is indeed tempting, but I'm worried it might just be another aircoin feast. Smart contract automation sounds great, but can multi-signature wallets really be trusted... Cross-chain governance sounds advanced, but could it just be another PPT coin trick? Maybe this time is truly different, but I want to see how long they can hold on.

View OriginalReply0

StakeHouseDirector

· 01-09 00:55

48-hour execution? Is this speed serious? I need to see how it's actually implemented. --- Finally, someone has cured the bloated disease of DAOs. Other projects still have a lot of work to do. --- A 500,000 USDC incentive pool—can small investors also make money? I need to ponder this strategy. --- Cross-chain governance sounds impressive, but I'm worried it might just be another PPT plan. --- If modular design can truly be combined, then the ecosystem interconnection is halfway to completion. --- The move of earning through voting is powerful, directly hitting the desire to participate. --- Multi-signature + automated scripts—technical skills are real strength, unlike some DAOs that boast but can't deliver. --- Funds just lying around for retirement is indeed a common problem for most DAOs. This improvement is worth watching. --- Let's see if they can replicate this system in other communities. If it works, it could break the deadlock. --- How is the 30%-40% efficiency increase calculated? Can you provide data?

View OriginalReply0

BitcoinCultureGm

· 01-08 03:36

I wish you at least one new NFT in your collection for the new year 2026.

Reply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-08 02:54

Is 48-hour execution possible? And is this a good thing? Let's see how this cross-chain governance works. --- A reward pool of 500,000 USDC sounds good, but the real question is, can you actually get your share? --- The core issue with DAO efficiency still comes down to people being too lazy. Can technology solve this? I remain skeptical. --- Multi-signature + automated execution scripts—I want to give this combo a try. Or is it just old wine in new bottles? --- Can small retail investors also make money? Take that with a grain of salt; big players are still big players. --- Modular design sounds like what all projects are bragging about, but how many can actually put it into practice? --- I believe funds will arrive on Monday, but the key is whether that money can generate a return. --- Incentive mechanisms are the real key; without money, who would participate in governance? --- Cross-chain asset scheduling? Let's wait and see, don’t let it turn out to be another broken promise. --- This efficiency truly breaks the norm, but I wonder how big the security risks are.

View OriginalReply0

DataPickledFish

· 01-08 02:47

Executing in 48 hours? If that happens, our DAO will have already been arguing nonstop. Is it really possible to run this fast, or is it just another new trick to cut the leeks again? A 500,000 USDC reward pool sounds great, but will this money really reach ordinary people in the end? Building a DAO with LEGO bricks sounds good, but the key is whether anyone will actually use it. If cross-chain governance can be achieved, it would definitely be much better than the current zombie DAOs. Automatic contract execution sounds great, but I'm worried that if there's a bug in the smart contract one day, everything will be lost. A well-designed incentive mechanism is the key; otherwise, no matter how fast it is, no one will pay attention. Can this efficiency improvement last? Or will it be back to slacking off in less than two months?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-08 02:46

48-hour execution? That's actually interesting, just wondering how long it can hold up. The 500k USDC reward pool is the real key here—no money, who the hell participates anyway. Cross-chain governance sounds good, but it's a whole different story when actually running it. This multi-sig + automation solution has honestly been thought of before, the thing is hardly anyone actually implements it. The incentive design is solid, just worried the funding dries up later and we're back to the death spiral. The modular Lego brick analogy feels a bit oversold if you ask me. Efficiency issues are solved, but what about human nature problems? Proposal quality is still mostly trash anyway. Looks decent, but let's revisit it next quarter, don't be too optimistic. Forget it, just gonna watch from the sidelines—I've heard way too many DAO stories already.

View OriginalReply0

MissedAirdropBro

· 01-08 02:37

Really, 48-hour execution? This is exactly how a DAO should operate. I've truly understood this wave of List; no need to talk about those superficial things. A 500,000 USDC reward pool? I need to see how much holding power it can generate. Once cross-chain governance goes live, how will other DAOs operate? This technology is a dimensionality reduction attack. Wait, can this multi-signature wallet really execute automatically? How is the risk mitigated? Even small investors can participate and make money. Wake up, it still depends on whether the token price goes up or not. The Lego brick analogy is indeed vivid, but can it truly seamlessly connect with other protocols?

View OriginalReply0

HashRatePhilosopher

· 01-08 02:35

Executing within 48 hours? Sounds good, but let's see how long it can really last once it gets started. The 500,000 USDC reward pool for LitiNia is indeed attractive, but unfortunately most people still end up not earning anything in the end. No matter how fast the technology is, if the community doesn't participate, it's all pointless. That's the real issue. Cross-chain governance sounds impressive, but I'm worried it might just be PPT governance again. Can LEGO building blocks solve the human nature problems of DAO? Feels overly optimistic. Multi-signature wallets with automated scripts... this solution isn't actually that innovative. Giving small retail investors some crumbs to participate might boost engagement? I feel like it's still a game for the big players. 48 hours is indeed fast, but the key question is whether the quality of proposals will decline as a result. Modular design sounds good, but how do the components coordinate? What about the details? Even a larger incentive pool can't compare to real voting power; the fundamental problem remains unsolved.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationOracle

· 01-08 02:28

Execute within 48 hours? That's not scientific; it depends on whether it can truly be implemented in the end. Lista's approach of multi-signature + automated scripts is practical, but their ideas about cross-chain are a bit too idealistic. A reward pool of 500,000 USDC is definitely attractive, but the key is whether it can be sustained afterward. The modular Lego analogy has become tiresome; what's crucial is whether the ecosystem participation can pick up. If this isn't just marketing, then it really has some substance.

View OriginalReply0