$CHZ Brothers, keep holding onto your short positions, whether on-chain or spot, funds have been flowing out continuously. We can double up and exit directly, focusing on stability. Profits in hand are your own, never greedier. Looking forward to this 🥚 ending soon, so brothers can cash out and enjoy some good gains. Next, Brother Kai will continue to monitor $SKYAI , $HYPE and other altcoins. Brother Kai will be laying low these days. Not promising a hundredfold increase, but definitely enough for brothers to make some profit. If you want to follow along, find Brother Kai in the chat room 👉👉👉[@凯哥日常带单](gt://mention/yFUEbptOBzNdJnTd). #美国寻求战略比特币储备 #DeFi4月安全事件损失超6亿美元 #比特币现货交易量新低

Only focus can live up to passion; only deep cultivation can live up to trading!! Welcome new friends to Whale 10k Oil!!$BTC $GT $ETH

So I came across this interesting breakdown on what Bitcoin could actually be worth, and it's not the usual moon-talk you see everywhere. Austin Arnold interviewed Mark Moss, who's built actual tech companies and runs a Bitcoin venture fund, and they went deep into the math behind potential bitcoin price movements through 2040 and beyond. Here's what caught my attention: instead of guessing based on sentiment, Moss pulls from Congressional Budget Office data on debt and money supply projections through 2054. The framework is pretty straightforward once you see it. Global store-of-value assets like gold, real estate, stocks, and bonds are projected to hit $1.6 quadrillion by 2030. If Bitcoin captures just 1.25% of that pool, the math points to $1,000,000 per coin by 2030. That's not hype talking. That's what happens when you run the numbers on monetary expansion. What's wild is the bitcoin price 2040 scenario. If the money supply keeps expanding at current rates, that store-of-value basket could balloon to $3.5 quadrillion. Using the same percentage model, Bitcoin could hit $14,000,000 per coin by then. I know it sounds crazy, but when you compare Bitcoin's current market cap to total global assets, it's actually tiny. Moss made a solid point comparing it to early Apple stock—felt risky then, obvious in hindsight. One thing that stuck with me was his take on risk. Back in 2015 when he bought around $300, the downside risks were massive. Would governments ban it? Would it survive? Now? Those existential risks have mostly evaporated. Governments are accumulating it. Over 170 public companies added Bitcoin to their balance sheets. MicroStrategy started what Moss calls a corporate gold rush. That's not speculation—that's institutional adoption changing the risk profile. The core insight isn't really about predicting exact numbers. It's about understanding why the bitcoin price 2040 trajectory matters: when governments print money, assets denominated in that money go up in nominal terms. More dollars chasing the same amount of Bitcoin means higher prices. It's basic liquidity and monetary policy, not memes or hype cycles. By 2050, Moss suggests Bitcoin could move well beyond tens of millions per coin, though he didn't pin down a specific number. The real shift would be psychological—Bitcoin wouldn't feel like an alternative asset anymore. It'd be as normal as the internet, something people use without questioning it. The question isn't whether Bitcoin rises. It's whether people understand the mechanics driving it. When scarcity meets monetary expansion, bitcoin price 2040 and beyond becomes less about prediction and more about math. Current BTC is trading around $78.74K, which gives you a sense of where we are in that trajectory. Worth keeping on your radar if you're thinking about long-term store-of-value positioning.