
Token issuance refers to the initial release and distribution of tokens by a blockchain project. It is the process in which a project creates tokens and allocates them to participants according to pre-established rules. The main objectives include fundraising, attracting users and developers, and incentivizing ecosystem contributions. After issuance, tokens typically become tradable on exchanges or on-chain platforms and can be used for transaction fees, governance voting, access to services, or earning rewards.
Token issuance directly impacts project value and participant returns.
The issuance phase determines the initial token price, circulating supply, and allocation targets—factors that shape post-listing volatility and long-term performance. For users, understanding different issuance models and rules helps in deciding whether to participate and how to manage their positions. For projects, choosing an appropriate issuance method balances fundraising efficiency with community acceptance.
It is also crucial to understand token utility. Utility tokens can be used for payments or governance; tokens with speculative demand but lacking real use cases carry significant risk. Additionally, features like vesting schedules (gradual token release over time) and lock-up periods affect the liquidity available for selling and the pace of potential sell pressure.
From creation and pricing to distribution and unlocking.
Step 1: Token Creation and Rule Setting. Projects deploy smart contracts (self-executing code on-chain) to define total supply, minting/burning rights, transfer rules, and disclose use cases and allocation ratios (team, community, investors, ecosystem funds) in the whitepaper.
Step 2: Pricing and Sale. Common approaches include fixed-price subscription, auction models, or bonding curve pricing. Fixed prices suit early-stage subscriptions; auctions let the market determine price; curve pricing adjusts automatically based on buying and selling activity, enabling dynamic price discovery.
Step 3: Distribution and Delivery. Participants submit funds (often stablecoins like USDT pegged to USD) via exchanges or wallets. After the sale ends, they receive tokens or allocation certificates. If lock-up or vesting is set, tokens unlock gradually by month or quarter.
Step 4: Listing and Liquidity. Centralized exchanges or decentralized trading platforms list trading pairs. Teams and market makers provide initial liquidity, and prices enter market-driven phases. Project development and ecosystem growth then influence long-term token value and demand.
Typical models include ICO, IEO, IDO, airdrops, and more.
ICO: The project sells tokens directly to the public with a simple process. Regulatory requirements and disclosure standards vary by region. Newcomers should verify official channels and contract addresses to avoid phishing scams.
IEO: Token sales are organized and reviewed by exchanges. For example, Gate’s Startup/Launchpad events publish project materials and subscription times; users subscribe using USDT according to the rules, receive tokens based on allocation ratios after sale, then the tokens are listed. IEOs offer standardized processes and stronger risk controls but often feature limited allocations and high competition.
IDO: Tokens are sold on decentralized platforms (participants use wallets directly). Models include whitelist participation, public pools, auctions, or liquidity mining. Benefits include openness and transparency; downsides are vulnerability to bots and higher price volatility.
Airdrop: Projects distribute tokens for free to early users or those who complete specific tasks—aimed at bootstrapping communities and rewarding contributions (e.g., wallet interactions, testnet submissions, governance votes). Airdrops have no subscription cost but may see immediate sell pressure or fake-task risks.
Fair Launch: No private sales or reserved allocations; anyone can acquire tokens under equal rules, such as open mining or public minting at launch. Highly recognized by communities but subject to greater early price swings—participants need patience and risk tolerance.
LBP (Liquidity Bootstrapping Pool): Uses time-decreasing curves influenced by buying activity for price discovery, reducing instant price spikes. Suitable for fairer pricing but requires users to understand the mechanism and timing.
Manage positions, verify information sources, and diversify participation.
Step 1: Verify Sources. Only participate via official announcements, exchange pages, or contract addresses; check website domains, social media profiles, and team backgrounds to avoid fraudulent links or phishing sites.
Step 2: Assess Tokenomics. Confirm total supply, initial circulating ratio, lock-up periods, and vesting schedules. For example, if team/private allocations unlock linearly over 12–36 months, early sell pressure is controlled; short-term concentrated unlocks increase volatility risk.
Step 3: Understand Pricing Mechanisms. With fixed-price sales, monitor subscription multiples and allocation ratios; for auctions, set a psychological ceiling price; with curve pricing, watch buy-side strength and pool parameters—avoid heavy positions during steep price phases.
Step 4: Choose Participation Channels. Beginners should prioritize large platforms like Gate for IEOs due to standardized disclosure and risk controls; when using decentralized platforms, always use hardware wallets, enable multi-factor authentication, and set reasonable spending limits.
Step 5: Develop a Trading Plan. Pre-set take-profit/stop-loss levels and post-unlock selling strategies to avoid emotional trading; diversify across projects and issuance models to reduce single-point risks.
Issuance volume has rebounded this year with stricter compliance and longer lock-ups.
In the past year leading up to 2025, platform-organized sales have increased in proportion. According to publicly reported statistics from various platforms, Q3 2025 data shows that exchange-hosted offerings represent over half of new token launches—IEOs and enhanced subscriptions attract newcomers due to clear processes and better disclosure.
Returns have diverged significantly. Median day-one performance for new listings has ranged from -10% to +30% in recent months, with notable differences by sector: infrastructure and AI-related projects attract more capital while pure-concept projects see cooling interest. Compared with 2024, this year’s volatility is concentrated at launch before returning to fundamentals.
Vesting periods are generally longer. Most new projects now have vesting schedules of 12–36 months with lower initial circulating supply—intended to ease selling pressure and enable longer-term development; this disadvantages short-term traders but supports healthier long-term growth.
Compliance is a clear trend. Markets in the US, Europe, and parts of Asia have tightened disclosure standards and compliance checks—platforms now enforce stricter review of project documents, risk controls, and user eligibility (KYC and regional restrictions are more common), driving capital toward compliant platforms.
Purpose, regulation, and participation thresholds differ.
Nature of rights: IPOs issue company shares representing ownership and dividends; tokens generally confer usage rights or governance within a network—not equivalent to equity ownership.
Pricing & delivery: IPOs rely on investment bank bookbuilding with settlement on regulated securities markets; token issuance is more flexible—organized by exchanges or via on-chain auctions/bonding curves—with direct delivery to user wallets.
Regulation & scope: IPOs are heavily regulated as securities offerings with participation mostly limited to qualified institutions or restricted retail investors; token issuance is globally accessible but compliance requirements vary widely by region—users must verify local laws.
Volatility & liquidity: Tokens typically experience higher volatility and market-maker effects during early listing stages—users need robust risk management strategies.
USDT has no fixed maximum supply; Tether mints new USDT dynamically based on market demand. Each issuance should be backed by corresponding USD reserves at a 1:1 ratio in theory. However, reserve transparency has been debated—investors should consult official audit reports and on-chain issuance data for updates.
Fair token issuance employs various anti-manipulation mechanisms: setting lock-up periods for founders to prevent early dumping; enforcing issuance rules via smart contracts; publishing transparent issuance plans and unlocking schedules. Projects listed on platforms like Gate undergo audits and operate under community oversight.
Use block explorers (e.g., Etherscan) to search the token contract address for details on total supply, circulating amount, and transfer records. Gate’s asset detail pages also display essential token info. Always consult the project's official whitepaper for complete tokenomics including issuance and unlocking plans.
Minting increases overall supply which dilutes existing holders’ share—potentially leading to price declines. If new issuance supports ecosystem growth or replaces burned tokens it may be positive long-term; uncontrolled minting is generally a negative signal. Investors should review tokenomics especially unlocking/minting schedules before investing.
Initial allocation reflects a project's governance philosophy: some favor founders (centralization), others prioritize community (decentralization), while some reserve large shares for investors. Differences stem from fundraising methods, project stage, ecosystem goals. More balanced/transparently allocated projects tend to carry lower risk—review project whitepapers on platforms like Gate for details.


