
Economic utility refers to the tangible value and satisfaction that users gain from a product or service.
It addresses a fundamental question: Is this useful to me? Does it save me money or time, and is it worth using repeatedly? In the crypto space, economic utility translates into the concrete benefits offered by tokens and protocols—such as cheaper payments, faster transactions, discounted fees, earning a share of protocol revenue through holding or staking, governance voting rights, or membership-style access.
A common extension is "marginal utility," which refers to the additional satisfaction from each extra use. Marginal utility typically declines over time, so features that encourage users to pay repeatedly are what constitute real utility.
Understanding economic utility helps you assess whether a project or token delivers genuine user value and sustainable revenue.
From an investment and usage perspective, products with strong economic utility are more likely to be used repeatedly and generate "real revenue" instead of relying solely on subsidies. For project teams, identifying key utility points allows for resource allocation toward features users are willing to pay for, preventing tokens from being used purely as speculative price instruments.
For individual users, focusing on economic utility helps avoid hype-driven decisions and prioritize products that lower costs, improve efficiency, and offer sustainability—for example, choosing stablecoins for cross-border transfers or platforms with fee rebates for frequent trading.
Economic utility emerges from the intersection of "solving real problems" and "users’ willingness to pay."
Economic utility in crypto is defined by where it occurs, how it happens, and why.
In stablecoin payments, users opt for USDT or USDC for cross-border settlements due to low fees, fast speed, and 24/7 availability. Utility arises with every transfer that replaces traditional banking channels—because on-chain settlement dramatically reduces cost and time.
In DeFi lending and trading (e.g., Aave lending or Uniswap swaps), utility comes from on-demand global access, removing account barriers and operating hours. Users are willing to pay minimal fees for liquidity and transparency.
On exchanges like Gate, frequent traders value fee structures and rebate mechanisms. VIP membership or holding platform points can unlock maker fee discounts, cashback on trades, or Launchpad allocations—directly lowering costs or increasing opportunities for new assets, which encourages ongoing engagement.
For RWA (real-world asset tokenization) and on-chain membership scenarios, utility centers on accessibility and revenue sharing. For instance, holding certain project tokens might grant protocol income distribution or unlock specific features—driving users to hold and use tokens for tangible benefits.
Why does this happen? Because users vote with their actions. Features that save money, time, or grant clear benefits lead to repeat usage and payment—transforming utility into revenue and retention.
Measure by asking "Are people willing to pay repeatedly?" Enhance by "making core utility easier to access."
Over the past year, key on-chain and platform data have shown structural shifts reflecting utility.
Stablecoin Settlement Volumes: On-chain stablecoin settlements have continued rising over the past year. Industry dashboards like DefiLlama and Dune indicate that in Q3 2025, annual stablecoin settlement volume reached multi-trillion USD levels—a notable increase from 2024—demonstrating the sustained utility of "stablecoins replacing traditional cross-border payments."
Protocol Revenue & Usage: In 2025, major public blockchains and select Layer 2 networks saw protocol revenues rise versus 2024—with Layer 2’s share increasing. Platforms like TokenTerminal (Q3/Q4 2025 snapshots) show more real revenue coming from trading/payments versus one-off incentives—indicating a greater share of "willing-to-pay" users.
DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL): As of December 2025 industry reports, overall TVL rebounded compared to 2024—with leading protocols maintaining dominance but "useful" sectors like stablecoin lending and restaking services gaining market share. This correlates with utility: users allocate assets where stable returns or clear discounts are available.
Exchange Activity: In the first half of 2025, active contract and spot trading user counts recovered; tiered fee discounts and rebate programs improved retention. On Gate, VIP tiers and activity-based fee savings increased the number of active days and trade depth among high-frequency users—a direct reflection of "cost-saving equals utility."
Note: Different data sources may use varying definitions; the same metric could yield different values. Focus on whether more users are paying repeatedly—not just price fluctuations.
Though often confused, these concepts have distinct focuses: economic utility considers "why an individual user pays," while network effects emphasize "the product gets better as more people use it."
Economic utility answers "Is this useful for me?"—for example, lower fees or revenue sharing; network effects answer "What extra benefits come from a bigger user base?"—such as deeper order books, faster trades, or social connections. Many successful products combine both but high user count alone does not prove utility.
In crypto, token discounts/dividends are closer to economic utility; increased liquidity/matching quality reflect network effects. Distinguishing these helps design better incentives: ensure repeatable paid utility first, then use network effects to scale.
Economic utility is the satisfaction you derive from a good or service. For example, buying coffee provides not just the beverage but also comfort or a social experience—all together form its economic utility. Understanding this helps you make smarter spending choices by evaluating whether your money is well spent.
This involves marginal utility—the idea that the value of a good varies by person or situation (e.g., food is worth more when hungry). Factors like brand, quality, or experience also affect perceived value; some are willing to pay premiums for luxury brands or superior service.
Economic utility in crypto depends on actual use cases and user needs—such as BTC for value storage, ETH as a smart contract platform, stablecoins for payments. Look at daily active users, transaction volumes, ecosystem app counts to gauge if real utility exists beyond mere speculation.
Strong tokenomics design aligns incentives so holders receive real benefits—such as earning yield via Staking on Gate, trading fee discounts with platform tokens, or dividend rights through governance participation. Good designs link token value directly to practical use cases—not just speculation.
Distinguish genuine utility from marketing hype: true economic utility has concrete use cases, substantial user bases, and verifiable transaction data—not vague promises. Prioritize objective metrics like active user counts or on-chain records over mere claims. Always perform due diligence on trusted platforms like Gate before trading to identify authentic utility.


