Some people say you can double your money by arbitraging USDT with just 10,000 RMB in ten trades. I laughed—the math looks perfect on paper, but what about reality?



# The "Math Game" on Paper

The formula is simple: Buy USDT with 10,000 RMB at a rate of 6.95, which gets you 1,438 USDT. Then sell it with a Hong Kong card at 7.83, immediately turning it into 11,266 HKD, which converts back to about 10,232 RMB. That's a single trade profit of 232 RMB, a 2.32% return.

Some people really believe in the magic of compounding—repeat this ten times and, in theory, you could make 2,577 RMB. The math checks out, but is this actually doable?

# Three Deadly Pitfalls

**Fees are a bottomless pit.** Banks take a cut for cross-border transfers, platforms take another cut on withdrawals, and that 232 profit might not even cover your costs.

**Exchange rates never cooperate.** The rates 6.95 and 7.83 only exist for a fleeting second—next moment, they could flip. You just bought in, and the selling price crashes. Profit? Forget about it.

**Regulatory risks are real.** Frequent cross-platform transactions will attract the bank’s risk control systems. Getting your account frozen is the least of your problems; being accused of illegal business activities is serious trouble.

# The Harsh Truth of Probability

Suppose each trade has a 0.5% chance of being flagged—sounds low, right?

- After 10 trades, survival rate is 95%, not bad
- After 100 trades, survival rate drops to 60%, half are out
- After 1,000 trades? Survival rate is 0.665%—basically game over

I know a guy who made 200 on his first trade, 300 on his second, and thought he’d found the key to wealth. Third time, USDT price crashed, bank froze his account, and he lost 5,000. Now he tells everyone: "This money burns your hands."

# Let’s Be Real

A 2.32% return sounds sweet. But you need to think about three things:

**First, costs are higher than you think.** Fees, time, and exchange rate loss might leave you with a negative return.

**Second, compliance matters more than profit.** If you end up in legal trouble before making money, you’ve already lost.

**Third, your principal is the bottom line.** Better to earn less than to gamble on "survival rates"—making money but not being able to spend it is the biggest joke of all.

Arbitrage always looks perfect on paper. But in reality, it’s the hidden pitfalls that are truly deadly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 17h ago
Here we go again with the get-rich-quick scheme, it’s always the same old story. How many people have already fallen into this trap? No matter how good you are at math, it’s useless. The banks have had their eyes on these shady moves for a while now—it’s just a matter of time. 2.32% sounds tempting, but once you factor in the fees, you’re in the red. Hilarious. I know three friends who tried it, and now they all say it’s too hot to handle—seriously. Compliance is worth more than gold; if you don’t make money but end up in jail, it’s not worth it. Exchange rates are like dice in a casino—just when you think things are stable, that’s when it’s most dangerous. The more you play with odds, the riskier it gets. Don’t be fooled by that 95% survival rate—if you keep going, you’ll be out sooner or later. A plan that looks perfect on paper is always a different story in reality.
View OriginalReply0
HackerWhoCaresvip
· 17h ago
I've seen this trick too many times. 2.32% sounds nice, but after the fees are deducted, it's negative.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurkervip
· 17h ago
I couldn't help but laugh while listening. A 2.32% return rate is indeed clever, but in practice, the transaction fees could easily eat up your profits in no time.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidatorvip
· 17h ago
As soon as you bring up a probability model, you can tell it’s nonsense. A 95% survival rate over ten times sounds good, but the data itself is wrong—the risk control review is not an independent event.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)