A certain industry heavyweight recently made another shocking statement, directly laying out the hidden rules of the game: “Truly outstanding projects never have to pull strings to get listed; it’s actually the exchanges scrambling to approach them.”



This sounds great, but it’s also a harsh truth. Just look at how many projects nowadays haven’t even built a product demo or have zero users, yet throw huge sums just to buy a listing spot. And what happens? On launch day, trading volume is artificially high, but three days later it drops to zero, turning into a complete ghost town.

So where’s the problem?

Many project teams complain that “listing fees are too expensive,” but to be honest—it’s not about the cost, it’s that your project itself isn’t presentable. For those projects with real potential, exchanges are actually afraid of moving too slowly and letting other platforms list first, losing out on all the traffic. That’s how real the market is.

The core logic is actually simple: Stop focusing on exchanges all the time—get users on your side first.

In a decentralized world, you make your own rules. Think centralized exchanges charge too much? Go to a DEX—nobody’s stopping you. Take a top DEX for example: they never charge listing fees, yet their trading volume still takes off—because users care about value, not how much you spent to buy your ticket in.

When it comes to exchange listings, there are basically three models:
First: Fully open. Any coin can list, but scam projects flood in, and users get burned hard.
Second: Highly selective. Paid reviews—using money as a filter to weed out at least the worst actors.
Third: Hybrid models. Deposits, tiered listings, Web3 zones… plenty of variations, but at the core, it’s all about balancing safety and profit.

So stop fixating on listing fees.

What should project teams do? Focus on perfecting your product, building your ecosystem, and gaining real users.
What should exchanges do? Carefully vet projects, protect retail investors, and don’t let bad coins drive out the good.

Listing fees are just a business tactic—not the key to survival. What really determines success or failure is whether your project makes exchanges feel: “If we don’t list your coin, we’ll miss the next big wave.”

That’s the brutal truth: strong projects generate their own buzz; weak projects can beg all they want and still get nowhere.

What do you think? Have you seen any cases where projects bought their way onto exchanges only to end up dead in the water?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ExpectationFarmervip
· 6h ago
What you said is absolutely right, but looking at those projects that keep boasting about how great their product is, they only have double-digit users before listing, and still only double-digit users after listing—nothing has changed except for switching to a different exchange.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 6h ago
To put it bluntly, it's just blaming the exchange for your own shortcomings.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokensvip
· 6h ago
That's right, a garbage project is still garbage no matter how cheap it is. --- A truly good project doesn't care about the little money from listing. --- I've never seen a project survive just by paying to get listed. --- DEXs are the real free market; centralized exchanges love to play these games. --- Calling it fundraising with zero users? What a joke. --- I've heard the "fees are too high" excuse too many times; the truth is the project has no value. --- Do projects that exchanges fight to list actually exist? Seems like I've never seen one. --- Paying to get listed is basically exposing that your project isn't good enough—smart people get it. --- Polishing the product is the real key; everything else is just fluff. --- The logic is flawless, but most people just want to take shortcuts.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlphavip
· 6h ago
What you said is absolutely right, it's just that too many project teams are still living in a dream.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValuevip
· 6h ago
This statement is correct but not entirely; ultimately, it still depends on the background of the token and the strength of the capital behind it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)