#比特币对比代币化黄金 Recently, a crazy case has been circulating in the community: someone really managed to grow their initial capital from 1,000 yuan to 1 million. Sounds unbelievable? But they used an extremely disciplined compounding trading system.



**How did they start?**
With a starting capital of 140U, the core strategy was contract compounding. Each time, they used a small position of 30U, and cleared three key hurdles in a row: turning 100 into 200, 200 into 400, and 400 into 800. After three rounds, the principal jumped straight to 1,100U.

Then, they followed a three-pronged approach:
• Capturing volatility on the 15-minute timeframe, mainly focusing on short-term opportunities in BTC and ETH
• Executing strategic trades on the 4-hour cycle, using small positions along with regular BTC investments to stabilize the base
• Trend trades specifically targeting major moves, patiently waiting for the primary rally

Reportedly, using this approach, they turned 5,000 yuan into 100,000 in 2-3 months, achieving a return of over 2,100%. Of course, that’s just the first stage.

**What does it take to go from 100,000 to 1 million?**
Simply put: don’t be greedy, don’t act rashly, don’t be timid. Once you get the rhythm of compounding and regular investing right, the rest is just a matter of trading time for growth. It might take 1 to 4 years, but the path is clear.

This market isn’t short on opportunities; what’s lacking is a methodology for gradually growing small capital. If you’re also wondering how to start with a small principal, maybe this approach is worth studying.
BTC-1.58%
ETH-3.35%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoSourGrapevip
· 42m ago
If I had seen this post last year, I wouldn't still be losing money now...
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperervip
· 6h ago
Sounds like another case of survivor bias. The key question is, how many people followed the trend and got liquidated right away?
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegrettervip
· 6h ago
Wait, is this for real? I can believe turning 140U into 1100U, but a 2100% return in 2-3 months... Bro, you must have nerves of steel for that.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermitvip
· 6h ago
Sounds like the same old "compound interest myth." If it were really that smooth, who would still be working? But it’s true that the rolling position strategy can be really profitable when used at the right time.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 6h ago
Sounds like another pump-and-dump scheme. Nine out of ten of these cases are just hype.
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacyvip
· 6h ago
nah look, the "governance primitives" of this whole 1k-to-100k narrative are... arguably non-trivial in terms of survivorship bias, no? historical precedent suggests these case studies conveniently omit the path dependency on, let's say, *optimal market timing* and sub-optimal risk management among 99% of participants. but sure, the game theoretical implications are worth examining.
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)