Recently, I saw some people discussing a hypothetical scenario: if authorities really wanted to strictly regulate OTC traders, wouldn’t it actually be technically easy to achieve?
Imagine this scenario—the regulators would just need to bulk register accounts on mainstream platforms and conduct a transaction with each of these traders to obtain all the relevant information. But in reality, this kind of operation hasn’t happened on a large scale. What are the considerations behind this? Could things change?
From another perspective, BTC is classified as a commodity in some regions. Since it’s considered a commodity, the legality of buying and selling itself seems justifiable, right? What would happen if people bypassed stablecoins and conducted C2C transactions directly with BTC?
This could trigger a chain reaction: the existing USDT liquidity might be squeezed, and the fastest way to cash out would become converting to BTC first. The shift in demand could directly push up BTC’s price, and new capital entering the market would likely prioritize allocating to BTC. In a sense, this could actually accelerate BTC’s mainstream adoption, encouraging more people to truly hold and use it.
Of course, this is just speculation—the market will always find its own path.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FastLeaver
· 4h ago
If the regulators really wanted to take action, the whole P2P thing should have ended long ago, but since there hasn’t been any major moves… it just shows how deep the waters run.
Bypassing USDT and trading BTC directly? That logic is kind of interesting, but if BTC really becomes a commodity, those institutions like Grayscale would be overjoyed.
The market always finds a way, but the key is whether BTC will become the final way out, and when that happens, the price...
Honestly, this speculation might be overthinking things. Who can really predict which way policy will go?
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 4h ago
Regulation isn’t really that hard; it just depends on whether they actually want to take action. The chain of interests runs too deep... I agree with the logic that USDT is getting squeezed, and BTC going directly C2C will definitely change the liquidity landscape.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 4h ago
What regulators care about isn’t really the technology, it’s the political calculus, to put it bluntly...
The logic behind USDT being squeezed is interesting, but the standards for BTC as a commodity differ from place to place. When that day really comes, it’ll probably mean another round of fragmentation...
Bypassing stablecoins for direct BTC trading? Well, that’s basically going back to the early days of mining-for-coin swaps—history always repeats itself.
What are you thinking? Saying the market will find its own way is way too optimistic. Regulators have never let the market decide on its own.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 4h ago
The regulators are just pretending to be ignorant. If they really wanted to investigate, they would have done it long ago. The problem is that no one wants to disrupt this balance.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 4h ago
Regulators really dare to play open tricks—when the time comes, OTC will directly become a P2P world...
Treating BTC as a commodity is something that has actually been tried before; it just depends on which region breaks the ice first.
If USDT really gets a run, that's when this market will get interesting.
Recently, I saw some people discussing a hypothetical scenario: if authorities really wanted to strictly regulate OTC traders, wouldn’t it actually be technically easy to achieve?
Imagine this scenario—the regulators would just need to bulk register accounts on mainstream platforms and conduct a transaction with each of these traders to obtain all the relevant information. But in reality, this kind of operation hasn’t happened on a large scale. What are the considerations behind this? Could things change?
From another perspective, BTC is classified as a commodity in some regions. Since it’s considered a commodity, the legality of buying and selling itself seems justifiable, right? What would happen if people bypassed stablecoins and conducted C2C transactions directly with BTC?
This could trigger a chain reaction: the existing USDT liquidity might be squeezed, and the fastest way to cash out would become converting to BTC first. The shift in demand could directly push up BTC’s price, and new capital entering the market would likely prioritize allocating to BTC. In a sense, this could actually accelerate BTC’s mainstream adoption, encouraging more people to truly hold and use it.
Of course, this is just speculation—the market will always find its own path.