The NVT golden cross for BTC has appeared again, and the market is starting to promote the narrative of "valuation reset." To be honest, I've heard this explanation too many times.
Looking back at historical records makes it clear—this golden cross has appeared three times before, and after each occurrence, BTC has not fallen short. On average, the decline is around 25%. Is this called a reset? From another perspective, it seems more like major funds are doing some kind of operation as a cover.
The indicator itself is fine; the key is that market participants are too familiar with this setup. When signals become transparent enough and many people know about them, their predictive power begins to diminish. It's like a routine that, when overused, becomes easier to counter with reverse operations.
In the short term, I lean towards the view that the price will test the 82k support. If this level cannot hold, the subsequent correction space might be larger than expected. Of course, the market is always full of variables, and uncertainty is the norm. Proper risk management is more important than anything else.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlatlineTrader
· 12-19 13:49
Are you using that golden cross theory again? I don't see any real use in it.
Overusing tricks turns them into reverse indicators; don't get caught off guard.
If we can't hold 82k, we need to be cautious—it's more important than anything else.
I've heard "valuation reset" so many times my ears are getting calloused.
Doesn't history tell us we'll drop 25 points? We're still resetting.
Big institutions are waiting for market signals to weaken; the smart ones are running early.
Uncertainty is the key; managing risk properly is the most important.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 12-19 13:43
Coming back with this again? A golden cross three times and a drop three times, do they really think retail investors are fools?
Big capital is very experienced with this move; if the signals are used poorly, they become useless.
If 82k can't hold, be really careful and don't get trapped.
Everyone can look at indicators, but if everyone can, then no one can make money.
Wake up, everyone. Risk management is the key.
The NVT golden cross for BTC has appeared again, and the market is starting to promote the narrative of "valuation reset." To be honest, I've heard this explanation too many times.
Looking back at historical records makes it clear—this golden cross has appeared three times before, and after each occurrence, BTC has not fallen short. On average, the decline is around 25%. Is this called a reset? From another perspective, it seems more like major funds are doing some kind of operation as a cover.
The indicator itself is fine; the key is that market participants are too familiar with this setup. When signals become transparent enough and many people know about them, their predictive power begins to diminish. It's like a routine that, when overused, becomes easier to counter with reverse operations.
In the short term, I lean towards the view that the price will test the 82k support. If this level cannot hold, the subsequent correction space might be larger than expected. Of course, the market is always full of variables, and uncertainty is the norm. Proper risk management is more important than anything else.