Recently, a project announced a new token expenditure plan, aiming to unlock up to 5% of the token reserve to promote a USD stablecoin partnership. It sounds good, but it has caused a stir in the community.
Opponents are particularly worried—after all, 80% of the WLFI tokens are still locked. They believe this unlock could lead to a price dump, which is especially unfair to long-term holders. These concerns are quite realistic, as a large influx of tokens into the market usually puts pressure on the price.
However, supporters' logic also holds water. They argue that these incentives are beneficial for the long-term development of the ecosystem, and the stablecoin partnership could open new application scenarios, potentially driving ecosystem prosperity.
In short, it's the classic short-term dilution versus long-term value issue. How the project team and community find the balance will depend on ongoing communication.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerNgmi
· 15h ago
Here we go again with this set? 5% sounds small, but if it really drops, it still has to fall.
---
Long-term development is a joke. I just want to ask why we can't wait a bit longer to unlock.
---
Stablecoin cooperation sounds just like that fundraising scheme, in the end, retail investors still foot the bill.
---
NG,L, at times like this, the team should really listen more to the community's voice, instead of deciding on their own.
---
80% is still locked, so why rush to cut losses? That's a bit unreasonable.
---
Short-term dumping for long-term prosperity, I bet they just want to cut a wave of leeks first.
---
If this can really boost the ecosystem, then it's fine. I'm just worried it's another air hype.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 15h ago
Is it that same old story again, that stablecoin cooperation will lead to prosperity? I think they just want to make another quick buck.
---
5% sounds small, but combined with that 80% lock-up... feels like the logic is a bit mysterious.
---
If it were truly beneficial in the long run, why not prove it to us first?
---
No worries, no worries. Anyway, when the market crashes, they always talk about long-term development. We workers should just cut our losses.
---
By the way, what about the project's own tokens? Are they also unlocking, or are we retail investors the only ones suffering?
---
Oh, do I trust the project team or the wallet? I can handle this choice.
---
Stablecoins... really can't stabilize the price, bro.
Recently, a project announced a new token expenditure plan, aiming to unlock up to 5% of the token reserve to promote a USD stablecoin partnership. It sounds good, but it has caused a stir in the community.
Opponents are particularly worried—after all, 80% of the WLFI tokens are still locked. They believe this unlock could lead to a price dump, which is especially unfair to long-term holders. These concerns are quite realistic, as a large influx of tokens into the market usually puts pressure on the price.
However, supporters' logic also holds water. They argue that these incentives are beneficial for the long-term development of the ecosystem, and the stablecoin partnership could open new application scenarios, potentially driving ecosystem prosperity.
In short, it's the classic short-term dilution versus long-term value issue. How the project team and community find the balance will depend on ongoing communication.