Recently, comments from White House economic advisor Hassett have caused quite a stir in the market. He publicly supported Trump's assessment that "inflation is at a low level" and questioned the current year-over-year calculation method, suggesting instead to evaluate based on a three-month average data.
According to this new algorithm, the situation indeed appears more optimistic: current inflation is only 1.6% (below the Federal Reserve's 2% target), and core inflation has also fallen below the target, implying that the Fed's room for rate cuts is opening up.
The question is—this advisor previously said that inflation would remain high, and the Fed should make decisions purely based on data. The two statements seem to have a clear logical tension. Switch the algorithm, and the inflation outlook looks very different. Is this reflecting a more accurate analytical method, or is it a way to "stir up" support for a certain policy direction?
For holders of cryptocurrencies like BCH, BTC, ZEC, and other digital assets, this debate has practical significance. The Fed's policy direction directly influences liquidity expectations and the market performance of risk assets. The two algorithms—year-over-year and three-month average—yield vastly different conclusions—one indicating continued high interest rates, the other hinting at possible rate cuts.
Market participants now face a real dilemma: in a context of mixed policy signals and divergent data interpretations, how should they make reasonable asset allocation decisions? Relying solely on one side's viewpoint is clearly not prudent; independent thinking and risk management awareness are more necessary than ever.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CrashHotline
· 13h ago
Using this trick again? Changing the algorithm to manipulate data—these people really think we're fools.
If the interest rate cut really happens, BTC could rebound, but with such chaotic signals right now, I really don't dare to go all in.
The choice of algorithm is in their hands; we can only passively be manipulated, damn.
Shifting to the three-month moving average is just paving the way for a rate cut; I've seen this kind of move too many times.
How BTC will move still depends on the Federal Reserve's final decision; right now, guessing is just a waste of brainpower.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMaster
· 13h ago
Here we go again with this routine, changing the algorithm to change the world—brilliant, brilliant.
---
Basically, it's a multiple-choice data question; no matter how you calculate it, it can be valid. Anyway, we retail investors are just destined to be cut.
---
Interest rate cuts every day—if they really come, can our crypto market rise? It depends on what institutions think.
---
This logic flips faster than flipping a book. What was said before suddenly opposes now. I'm done with this kind of talk.
---
Three-month average vs. year-over-year comparison—it's all just paving the way for policies. Reliable analysis has long been strangled by politics.
---
What should we do with BTC now, everyone? The signals are too chaotic. We need to grasp the situation ourselves.
---
Playing tricks with inflation data—are they really cutting rates or just continuing to hold us back? Can they give a clear signal?
---
I just want to know if the rate cut really happens, can it push the coin prices up? Talking without action is pointless.
Recently, comments from White House economic advisor Hassett have caused quite a stir in the market. He publicly supported Trump's assessment that "inflation is at a low level" and questioned the current year-over-year calculation method, suggesting instead to evaluate based on a three-month average data.
According to this new algorithm, the situation indeed appears more optimistic: current inflation is only 1.6% (below the Federal Reserve's 2% target), and core inflation has also fallen below the target, implying that the Fed's room for rate cuts is opening up.
The question is—this advisor previously said that inflation would remain high, and the Fed should make decisions purely based on data. The two statements seem to have a clear logical tension. Switch the algorithm, and the inflation outlook looks very different. Is this reflecting a more accurate analytical method, or is it a way to "stir up" support for a certain policy direction?
For holders of cryptocurrencies like BCH, BTC, ZEC, and other digital assets, this debate has practical significance. The Fed's policy direction directly influences liquidity expectations and the market performance of risk assets. The two algorithms—year-over-year and three-month average—yield vastly different conclusions—one indicating continued high interest rates, the other hinting at possible rate cuts.
Market participants now face a real dilemma: in a context of mixed policy signals and divergent data interpretations, how should they make reasonable asset allocation decisions? Relying solely on one side's viewpoint is clearly not prudent; independent thinking and risk management awareness are more necessary than ever.