#以太坊行情解读 Can Bitcoin reach 200,000? The liquidity story under loose policies sounds appealing, but the real actions of major players tell a different story.
The latest Federal Reserve policy is interpreted by industry insiders as a form of QE, which means the devaluation of fiat currency is accelerating—theoretically, Bitcoin has logical support to rise from the current level to $124,000 or even surge to $200,000. The problem is, recently a top investor transferred 508 Ethereum to a large digital asset fund.
Saying one thing and doing another—this kind of operation is worth pondering. On the surface, the market appears to be driven by policy and trending upward unilaterally, but at the capital level, subtle differentiation is happening—retail investors are still dreaming of the "$124,000" feast, while institutions are reducing their positions at high levels. This is not a conspiracy; it’s the market’s inherent "expectation gap."
In the short term, there’s a high probability that Bitcoin will oscillate between $80,000 and $100,000. If a real liquidity wave comes, $124,000 is just the starting point; but if capital flows continue to diverge from optimistic narratives, be prepared to take profits at high levels.
The core logic is simple: policies are surface indicators, but wallet flows are the real indicator. Watching where major players’ funds are flowing is often more useful than listening to any analysis. How far this rally can go ultimately depends on real capital.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PanicSeller
· 11h ago
Big players are dumping their holdings, and we're still dreaming. This trick is all too familiar.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 11h ago
This move by the big players is really quite brilliant. Where's the promised 200,000? They quickly offloaded their holdings. Retail investors are still dreaming; they've already cashed out.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidated
· 11h ago
Big whales are reducing their positions while retail investors are still dreaming. This buying and selling is becoming more and more abnormal.
View OriginalReply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 11h ago
Big whales are reducing their positions while retail investors are still dreaming of 120,000. This expectation gap is quite extreme.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignSteve
· 11h ago
Watching big players dump at high levels really says a lot, tsk.
#以太坊行情解读 Can Bitcoin reach 200,000? The liquidity story under loose policies sounds appealing, but the real actions of major players tell a different story.
The latest Federal Reserve policy is interpreted by industry insiders as a form of QE, which means the devaluation of fiat currency is accelerating—theoretically, Bitcoin has logical support to rise from the current level to $124,000 or even surge to $200,000. The problem is, recently a top investor transferred 508 Ethereum to a large digital asset fund.
Saying one thing and doing another—this kind of operation is worth pondering. On the surface, the market appears to be driven by policy and trending upward unilaterally, but at the capital level, subtle differentiation is happening—retail investors are still dreaming of the "$124,000" feast, while institutions are reducing their positions at high levels. This is not a conspiracy; it’s the market’s inherent "expectation gap."
In the short term, there’s a high probability that Bitcoin will oscillate between $80,000 and $100,000. If a real liquidity wave comes, $124,000 is just the starting point; but if capital flows continue to diverge from optimistic narratives, be prepared to take profits at high levels.
The core logic is simple: policies are surface indicators, but wallet flows are the real indicator. Watching where major players’ funds are flowing is often more useful than listening to any analysis. How far this rally can go ultimately depends on real capital.