The Federal Reserve's policy direction is changing. Goldman Sachs Chief Analyst Kay Haigh recently pointed out that the Fed's recent "preemptive rate cuts" have come to an end. Simply put: want to continue easing? Unless employment data shows a significant deterioration, don't expect the Fed to loosen policy easily in the near term.
What does this mean? Just look at the latest internal statements from the Federal Reserve. There was a hard dissenting vote in this meeting, and soft dissent is hidden in the dot plot; hawkish voices are gaining strength. Especially in the policy statement, the Fed re-emphasized phrases like "the extent and timing of future policy"—on the surface to reassure members with different views, but essentially sending a signal: rate cuts are not impossible, but only if the labor market first shows enough pressure.
This means a new round of market game theory. #美国就业数据表现强劲超出预期 $ETH and other risk assets—what impact will they face? First, a re-pricing of interest rate expectations. The Fed's stance shifting from dovish to neutral or even hawkish means the market's optimistic outlook on future liquidity needs to be adjusted. Stocks, bonds, exchange rates—almost all asset classes may face reassessment.
For traders, the key is to closely monitor employment data. Non-farm payrolls, unemployment rate—these figures will directly influence the Fed's next move. As long as the labor market can "hold up," the Fed has no reason to rush into rate cuts. Conversely, if there is a clear employment downturn, the market will see new opportunities.
At this stage, a more cautious approach is needed: don't be blinded by short-term rebounds; the wind direction has shifted. Internal disagreements within the Fed are widening, indicating increasing policy uncertainty. How will the situation develop? Can the employment market continue to be pressured, or will it quickly show signs of recession? These will be key factors in determining the market's direction.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Rugpull幸存者
· 6h ago
You're trying to fool me again by saying employment is strong? Wake up, the hawks are here.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 6h ago
The hawks are rising, liquidity will decrease, and the short-term good days are coming to an end.
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 6h ago
Wait, strong employment data is actually bad news? I need to think this through carefully.
The Fed's rhetoric is just playing word games. No more rate cuts, so how can BTC be pumped?
It seems I have to wait until the US economy really crashes. Holding coins is too uncomfortable right now.
View OriginalReply0
orphaned_block
· 6h ago
Hawkishness is on the rise, so it's not going to be easy to manipulate anymore.
We have to wait for worsening employment data to cut interest rates. Alright, then let's see how the non-farm payrolls data plays out.
The Fed's internal debates are heating up. With so much uncertainty, I think I'll stay on the sidelines for now.
View OriginalReply0
StakeTillRetire
· 6h ago
Wait, strong employment data doesn't mean there's no short-term hope, right?
So this wave is about waiting until a recession to bet on a rebound? That's too difficult.
The hawkish side is truly dominant, I can see those little tricks in the dot plot.
Why does it feel like we're trapped in this back-and-forth game... We can only watch the non-farm payrolls.
The Federal Reserve is playing psychological warfare, sometimes dovish, sometimes hawkish.
I'm really hesitant to buy in this round since there's no obvious employment slowdown.
The liquidity situation has indeed shifted, we need to adjust our expectations.
The Federal Reserve's policy direction is changing. Goldman Sachs Chief Analyst Kay Haigh recently pointed out that the Fed's recent "preemptive rate cuts" have come to an end. Simply put: want to continue easing? Unless employment data shows a significant deterioration, don't expect the Fed to loosen policy easily in the near term.
What does this mean? Just look at the latest internal statements from the Federal Reserve. There was a hard dissenting vote in this meeting, and soft dissent is hidden in the dot plot; hawkish voices are gaining strength. Especially in the policy statement, the Fed re-emphasized phrases like "the extent and timing of future policy"—on the surface to reassure members with different views, but essentially sending a signal: rate cuts are not impossible, but only if the labor market first shows enough pressure.
This means a new round of market game theory. #美国就业数据表现强劲超出预期 $ETH and other risk assets—what impact will they face? First, a re-pricing of interest rate expectations. The Fed's stance shifting from dovish to neutral or even hawkish means the market's optimistic outlook on future liquidity needs to be adjusted. Stocks, bonds, exchange rates—almost all asset classes may face reassessment.
For traders, the key is to closely monitor employment data. Non-farm payrolls, unemployment rate—these figures will directly influence the Fed's next move. As long as the labor market can "hold up," the Fed has no reason to rush into rate cuts. Conversely, if there is a clear employment downturn, the market will see new opportunities.
At this stage, a more cautious approach is needed: don't be blinded by short-term rebounds; the wind direction has shifted. Internal disagreements within the Fed are widening, indicating increasing policy uncertainty. How will the situation develop? Can the employment market continue to be pressured, or will it quickly show signs of recession? These will be key factors in determining the market's direction.