#数字资产市场洞察 Short-term bearish warning for Bitcoin: Starting with macro analyst Luke Gromen's shift in perspective
Recently, macroeconomic analyst Luke Gromen expressed concerns about Bitcoin's short-term trajectory on a podcast. This seasoned investor, who has been actively accumulating below $30,000 since late 2022 and has held his position without change, has shifted his stance, which warrants serious attention from the market.
He presented three core points. First is the high correlation between Bitcoin and tech stocks. Although their movements are closely linked, Luke pointed out that the real bottleneck is not chip supply but electricity. When AI applications experience explosive growth, electricity shortages will become a limiting factor for the entire tech industry, thereby dragging down digital asset performance—this is not alarmism but a calm observation of industry realities.
Second is Bitcoin's relative disadvantage compared to gold. As a traditional safe-haven asset, gold performs steadily, while Bitcoin has lacked breakthrough progress within the same cycle. More critically, the liquidity environment faces a dilemma: either flood the market with liquidity to stimulate or tighten monetary policy. Neither scenario creates an ideal growth environment for cryptocurrencies. Without new capital inflows, upward price pressure is evident.
The third threat comes from the technical realm—advancements in quantum computing. Luke believes that within 2 to 9 years, quantum computing could pose a substantial threat to existing cryptographic algorithms. Once the difficulty of cracking them significantly decreases, Bitcoin's security foundation will be challenged. This is not a distant sci-fi hypothesis but a long-term risk that requires serious assessment.
Interestingly, Tether's latest moves seem to send a similar signal—they are increasing their investments in AI and gold, with gold even surpassing Bitcoin on their balance sheet. This structural adjustment may reflect market participants' reassessment of risk appetite in the coming months.
What are your thoughts on these viewpoints? Feel free to share your judgment in the comments.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseLandlord
· 8h ago
Uh... Luke, this turn was a bit sudden. Holding a position for over two years and just worrying about it? I understand the logic of tight electricity supply, but is it really worse than gold? We need to be clear in our minds...
---
Regarding quantum computing, I honestly haven't thought that far ahead, but Tether is already adjusting its portfolio, so we definitely need to pay attention. Following the big players' instincts is always sharp.
---
It feels like everyone is playing a game of liquidity—either easing or tightening... Anyway, retail investors have no choice but to bet on the right direction.
---
Is gold stable? Well, that's relative. When the crash actually happens, everything will be the same. Just look at March.
---
Luke mentioned quantum cracking in two to nine years... That time span is ridiculously long. Who knows? Maybe Bitcoin already upgraded its protocol long ago. These worries might be a bit overblown.
---
Tether combined with gold allocation exceeds BTC... Alright, big whales are starting to reduce risk, and retail investors still want to buy the dip? What are they thinking?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 9h ago
Power shortage? Luke's observation is quite eye-opening, I hadn't thought about this before.
---
Tether has increased its gold holdings beyond BTC, this signal is a bit alarming... need to ponder it.
---
Quantum computing is really just scratching the surface, 2 to 9 years still sounds too optimistic.
---
Short-term bearish? Just be bearish then, anyway someone always calls for a decline, still need to accumulate.
---
It's not wrong to say there's no new capital entering the market; liquidity is the core, everything else is虚.
---
Wait, he's never changed his holdings but now he's starting to express concerns? How does that logic add up...
---
No one really paid attention to the AI power demand this time, are the chips enough, is the electricity sufficient?
---
Gold vs Bitcoin will be debated again, but this time the data actually speaks.
---
Feels like everyone is using "quantum threat" to scare people, quite comfortable, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyer
· 9h ago
Looking at Luke's shift in perspective is quite interesting, but saying that the power shortage is too absolute... Could it be that AI really is booming and no one is trying to solve the power issue?
---
I believe in Tether's rebalancing, but using this to argue that Bitcoin is weak feels a bit forced... Maybe from a different angle, it's just preparing for the next wave of deployment.
---
Quantum computing threatening in 2-9 years? Man, that time span is so broad it’s almost meaningless. It’s just leaving enough room for retreat.
---
Gold outperforming BTC is indeed a tough pill to swallow, but the variable of liquidity seems too unpredictable... Who can really say for sure?
---
It turns out even big players holding positions without moving can "shift" their stance. Is this really a sign to be cautious, or just market sentiment swinging... hard to say.
---
Power shortages limiting AI computing power—can this logic really be directly linked to Bitcoin? Why are these two even tied together?
---
Luke's points together seem a bit like looking for reasons to be bearish, but on the other hand, it also makes some sense... Feeling conflicted.
View OriginalReply0
GetRichLeek
· 9h ago
Damn, Luke has been holding his position since he bought the dip at 30,000 and hasn't sold a single coin. Now he's suddenly starting to bearish? Is that for real...
I haven't heard about power shortages before. The on-chain data doesn't show anything either. Is this a new positive signal?
I believe in the stability of gold, but saying BTC hasn't broken through is going too far... The technical support is still there, and there's no sign of retail investors bottoming out in the distribution of chips.
Quantum computing threats? When is that going to happen... I’ve lost so much, I don’t even know if I can wait for that day...
I did see Tether adjusting its positions. These institutions love to play this game, creating panic and then buying low. How many times have we been tricked by this routine?
#数字资产市场洞察 Short-term bearish warning for Bitcoin: Starting with macro analyst Luke Gromen's shift in perspective
Recently, macroeconomic analyst Luke Gromen expressed concerns about Bitcoin's short-term trajectory on a podcast. This seasoned investor, who has been actively accumulating below $30,000 since late 2022 and has held his position without change, has shifted his stance, which warrants serious attention from the market.
He presented three core points. First is the high correlation between Bitcoin and tech stocks. Although their movements are closely linked, Luke pointed out that the real bottleneck is not chip supply but electricity. When AI applications experience explosive growth, electricity shortages will become a limiting factor for the entire tech industry, thereby dragging down digital asset performance—this is not alarmism but a calm observation of industry realities.
Second is Bitcoin's relative disadvantage compared to gold. As a traditional safe-haven asset, gold performs steadily, while Bitcoin has lacked breakthrough progress within the same cycle. More critically, the liquidity environment faces a dilemma: either flood the market with liquidity to stimulate or tighten monetary policy. Neither scenario creates an ideal growth environment for cryptocurrencies. Without new capital inflows, upward price pressure is evident.
The third threat comes from the technical realm—advancements in quantum computing. Luke believes that within 2 to 9 years, quantum computing could pose a substantial threat to existing cryptographic algorithms. Once the difficulty of cracking them significantly decreases, Bitcoin's security foundation will be challenged. This is not a distant sci-fi hypothesis but a long-term risk that requires serious assessment.
Interestingly, Tether's latest moves seem to send a similar signal—they are increasing their investments in AI and gold, with gold even surpassing Bitcoin on their balance sheet. This structural adjustment may reflect market participants' reassessment of risk appetite in the coming months.
What are your thoughts on these viewpoints? Feel free to share your judgment in the comments.