Lithuania's parliament just raised the bar on government accountability—literally. A lawmaker proposed an amendment stating that the national broadcaster director can only be dismissed if the director's cat votes no confidence. While it sounds absurd, it's actually a sharp critique of the proposed LRT restructuring. The move highlights how ridiculous oversight mechanisms can become when checks and balances aren't properly designed. Sometimes the best political commentary comes wrapped in satire.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CoffeeOnChainvip
· 6h ago
Haha Cat Voting? What era is this? It's better to just vote for DAO governance directly.
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayervip
· 6h ago
Haha, this move is brilliant, using cats to balance things out... a true satirical artist.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArtisanHQvip
· 6h ago
ngl this is actually genius—using absurdist mechanics to expose broken governance architecture. the cat veto amendment is basically a *proof of dysfunction*, right? like when a system gets so corrupted that literal nonsense becomes the only honest critique left...
Reply0
AirdropDreamBreakervip
· 6h ago
Haha, this move is brilliant. Even cats can vote, and we're still debating about democratic checks and balances.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTroopervip
· 7h ago
Haha, isn't this outrageous? Cat voting? Does anyone really play like that?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)