When sharing group chat content, I adhere to several principles. First, information from public groups can be directly quoted; private groups require the group's owner’s permission, but the group name and all member IDs will be hidden to ensure privacy. Second, regarding information acquisition—everyone should establish their own list of information sources, which is much more efficient than passively browsing public news. Finally, there is a bottom line when it comes to paid content: macro insights and key points can be shared, but the original reports themselves are not suitable for direct forwarding. This approach both protects privacy and facilitates the flow of valuable information.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SerRugResistantvip
· 5h ago
Haha, this set of rules is indeed reliable, but to be honest, most people in private groups are too lazy to ask for authorization.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetectorvip
· 5h ago
Like, this logic is indeed clear-headed. Authorization for private groups is especially important, otherwise it's really easy to mess up.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStormvip
· 5h ago
Well said, this is what true information arbitrage logic looks like. From a quantitative perspective, the efficiency improvement of building your own information source list is indeed exponential, several times faster than passive news brushing by retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)