A major cryptocurrency fund has quietly shifted its internal outlook for 2026. Fundstrat's latest strategy memo to clients forecasts a significant market correction hitting the first half of next year—a stark divergence from the more bullish narrative their leadership has been pushing publicly.
The disconnect raises questions about what institutional players are actually positioning for behind closed doors versus their public messaging. Internal reports from major funds often reflect more cautious scenario planning than their external communications, suggesting market participants should prepare for volatility even as optimistic commentary dominates the headlines.
This kind of divergence between private strategy and public statements is worth monitoring, especially when timing a market entry or managing exposure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnlyUpOnly
· 13h ago
It's the same old trick again, claiming a bull market but shorting in practice. These institutions really know how to play.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 13h ago
It's the same old trick again, shouting bull market with your mouth but selling off your holdings in your hands.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 13h ago
Starting this again, big institutions say one thing and do another behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 13h ago
Oh no, it's the same old trick—calling for a bull market on the surface but liquidating assets behind the scenes. This is what you call "Schrödinger's bullishness."
View OriginalReply0
RugpullTherapist
· 14h ago
Everyone is just lying, talking big but actually just hoarding air.
A major cryptocurrency fund has quietly shifted its internal outlook for 2026. Fundstrat's latest strategy memo to clients forecasts a significant market correction hitting the first half of next year—a stark divergence from the more bullish narrative their leadership has been pushing publicly.
The disconnect raises questions about what institutional players are actually positioning for behind closed doors versus their public messaging. Internal reports from major funds often reflect more cautious scenario planning than their external communications, suggesting market participants should prepare for volatility even as optimistic commentary dominates the headlines.
This kind of divergence between private strategy and public statements is worth monitoring, especially when timing a market entry or managing exposure.