The most brutal lesson from crypto cycles: influence gets weaponized.
When someone with a platform abuses the trust people place in them, it erodes everything. Yet somehow the community keeps amplifying those same voices afterward—like we collectively forgot the damage.
It shouldn't work this way. Exploitation shouldn't come with a pass back to relevance. The fact that it does? That's the real problem we're not talking about. We give platforms to people who've already proven they'll burn that trust for profit, then act shocked when history repeats.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenVelocityTrauma
· 4h ago
Honestly, how many times have we fallen for this trick, and we're still getting fooled?
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 4h ago
Basically, it's just that we are too forgetful. Falling for it once and still daring to use it again—serves you right for getting cut.
View OriginalReply0
rugdoc.eth
· 4h ago
Honestly, being backstabbed hurts the most. Isn't this the norm in crypto?
---
Repeating the same mistakes again, why can't I learn?
---
Trust, once shattered, can never be glued back together.
---
After harvesting the leek, coming back to ride the hype—do we just pretend nothing happened? LOL
---
The platform burns trust as if it's a game, and we still give people a second chance—this logic is truly incredible.
---
Communities that don't learn from their lessons deserve to be repeatedly exploited.
---
I just enjoy watching some people shamelessly make a comeback, after all, many have a goldfish memory.
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDips
· 4h ago
We just don't learn our lesson. A scammer can cheat once and still turn things around. How outrageous is that?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 4h ago
To be honest, this is the most ironic part of Web3—we criticize it and then keep going with it.
The most brutal lesson from crypto cycles: influence gets weaponized.
When someone with a platform abuses the trust people place in them, it erodes everything. Yet somehow the community keeps amplifying those same voices afterward—like we collectively forgot the damage.
It shouldn't work this way. Exploitation shouldn't come with a pass back to relevance. The fact that it does? That's the real problem we're not talking about. We give platforms to people who've already proven they'll burn that trust for profit, then act shocked when history repeats.