There's a quiet psychology at play in crypto markets: some people unconsciously want others to fail, not out of malice, but to validate their own inaction. The logic is simple but flawed—if someone who actually grinded it out only made $2, then staying idle suddenly looks smart.
But here's the thing: comparing zero effort to minimal results creates a dangerous illusion. It's easy to convince yourself that doing nothing is the wiser play when you're looking at a $2 gain after months of work. The risk-free narrative feels justified. Yet it completely ignores the market mechanics, timing, and learning curve that separate a quiet period from an active one.
This mindset costs more than most realize.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
screenshot_gains
· 6h ago
Basically, it's self-deception. Seeing others make two bucks and secretly feeling happy.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 6h ago
Research shows that this actually involves the "rationalization bias" in cognitive biases—people tend to construct rational narratives after the fact to justify their choices. Data indicates that approximately 73% of holders subconsciously downplay the gains of active traders to justify the "lying flat" strategy.
It is worth noting that the author overlooked a key variable: sample bias. The person who only earned $2 may lack market timing sense or risk management frameworks, rather than implying that "active trading itself is ineffective." From a technical perspective, this involves multi-dimensional aspects such as signal recognition, liquidity analysis, and contract mechanisms; simply comparing outcome numbers cannot fully measure the situation.
In summary, the argument that "doing nothing also won't lead to losses" is based on a static market assumption, but the cyclical nature of the crypto market and the speed of technological iteration mean that "inaction" itself can be a high-cost behavior.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarker
· 6h ago
nah the $2 gain copium is real... but imagine thinking you outsmarted the market by doing literally nothing lmao. that's not risk management, that's just cope with extra steps honestly
Reply0
GasGrillMaster
· 6h ago
That's true, but I'm worried that some people secretly rejoice every time they see others lose money, doing nothing themselves and instead thinking they've won.
There's a quiet psychology at play in crypto markets: some people unconsciously want others to fail, not out of malice, but to validate their own inaction. The logic is simple but flawed—if someone who actually grinded it out only made $2, then staying idle suddenly looks smart.
But here's the thing: comparing zero effort to minimal results creates a dangerous illusion. It's easy to convince yourself that doing nothing is the wiser play when you're looking at a $2 gain after months of work. The risk-free narrative feels justified. Yet it completely ignores the market mechanics, timing, and learning curve that separate a quiet period from an active one.
This mindset costs more than most realize.