Previously, stories of tokenization mostly played out in the Solana ecosystem. This time, it's the first time a project team actively focused on multi-chain deployment. DNF's token strategy is quite interesting — they chose the BSC version instead of Solana. The logic behind this decision is worth examining. However, the initial liquidity is only around 200,000, which does seem a bit thin. To sustain the project's popularity, further efforts will be needed. Tokenization itself isn't a new concept; the key is how well the execution and community consensus can develop.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
4am_degenvip
· 7h ago
200,000 in liquidity? That's too meager, and you're still trying to generate hype.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobiavip
· 7h ago
Choosing Solana over BSC, I need to think about this... 200,000 in liquidity really can't hold up, one big order will cause it to crash.
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalystvip
· 8h ago
200,000 in liquidity? And you're daring to come out and cut? The technicals haven't even bottomed out yet, brother.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 8h ago
200,000 in liquidity? How can it sustain that? Feels like it will dump as soon as it goes live.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidatorvip
· 8h ago
200,000 liquidity? Dare to list on BSC now? Don't expect to support it until the consensus mechanism is well established. Validation efficiency needs to keep up.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)