"This time, I absolutely bottomed out!" I said through gritted teeth.

At 0.45, I rushed in. At 0.40, I told myself this was a golden pit, and kept adding. When it hit 0.30, I thought the market was crazy and went all in. By 0.20, unrealized losses had already kept me from sleeping well at night, but looking at those numbers, my hand still involuntarily pressed the buy button once more.

Then came 0.148. The numbers on the screen never moved again.

My account was like a broken sieve, money kept leaking out. I kept topping up until it was completely drained. Looking back at that K-line, it was not an opportunity at all, but an invisible hand gradually taking all my chips out of my pocket.

The most expensive lesson is called "I thought this was the bottom."

We all fell into this trap: watching assets evaporate, repeatedly self-hypnotizing "just one more top-up to break even," only to sink deeper. Behind this is actually a kind of panic—using continuous investment to suppress the fear of misjudgment.

But reality is cruel: in a pure speculative wave, there is no such thing as cost averaging, only risk stacking. Once the trend takes shape, any contrarian "faith recharge" is just adding fuel to the fire during a decline.

This leads to a deeper question: if part of our asset allocation includes assets that don't require us to guess "where the bottom is," whose value is always clear, stable, and certain, would our decisions be calmer, and would our mindset be much more at ease?