Research work really needs to consult professionals; there are no shortcuts.
I've always believed that ability and professionalism determine how far a person can go in the industry. If you understand industry logic, study thoroughly, and accumulate enough experience, you can do well in anything. Conversely, if your foundation is not solid and your thinking is unclear, no matter how hard you try, it will be useless. Becoming a true insider requires time, practice, and continuous learning.
Additionally, this project has recently shown some movement— a leading compliant platform has included it in its listing roadmap, which is worth paying attention to in the ZK track. The project's progress and recognition have both improved.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoTherapy
· 19h ago
There are no shortcuts in research and investment—I've heard this a hundred times, but few people can truly do it. Most still rely on luck and guesswork.
$BREV Is it included in the listing roadmap? ZK is definitely worth paying attention to; having a compliant platform endorsement still indicates some significance.
Speaking of which, no matter how much you hustle without a solid foundation, it's just busywork. I've seen too many cases like that.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreams
· 12-20 15:30
You're right, brother. Investment research really can't be rushed. I've learned this the hard way before.
This wave of BREV is indeed worth following. Endorsement from top compliant platforms is no small matter.
A weak foundation is truly just a castle in the air no matter how hard you try. The ZK track is now fiercely competitive.
Understanding industry logic and messing around blindly are truly two different worlds. I only now realize this truth.
Why aren't there more voices about the roadmap on BREV? It should be getting more attention.
Professionalism is really about long-term investment; there's no faking it.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 12-20 15:28
That's right, there's no shortcut in research and investment; you have to put in real effort.
The signal that BREVE is included in the listing roadmap is quite important, and the ZK track is finally showing some signs of progress.
If the foundation isn't solid, no matter how hard you try, it's all just pointless effort.
The increased recognition of $BREV in this round is quite promising; we need to keep following up.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 12-20 15:18
Research and analysis are indeed not like quick-frozen dumplings; you have to take your time to chew.
Once you understand the industry logic thoroughly, everything becomes easy to discuss; otherwise, even if you compete fiercely, it's just self-consolation.
The inclusion of BREV into the compliance platform listing chart is a positive signal; ZK is still worth keeping an eye on.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 12-20 15:16
That's right, there's really no shortcut—it's not just motivational talk... Watching without practicing is indeed a waste.
$BREV included in the listing roadmap? Now this is interesting, is the ZK track finally about to rise?
I've seen many people with shaky fundamentals, and in the end, it's just a mess.
Endorsement from compliant platforms still carries some weight, but it depends on whether they can keep up later.
Deep research on this stuff really takes time; quick analysis will eventually backfire.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssues
· 12-20 15:15
That's why so many people lose money—trying to figure things out on their own by guesswork, and it all turns out to be a trap.
I need to ask industry insiders what they think about BREV. How reliable are these kinds of roadmap announcements?
Don't make reckless moves without a solid foundation, really.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 12-20 15:11
They all say there are no shortcuts, but few people are truly willing to invest time in research. Most still want to double their investment quickly, haha.
$BREV has indeed acted quickly this time. Being recognized by compliant platforms is still convincing, and the ZK track is finally showing some signs of progress.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 12-20 15:09
That's right, shortcuts don't really exist in investment research. I also wanted to take a detour in my early years, but I ended up paying a lot of tuition fees before I understood. If your fundamentals are not solid, don't mess around; first master the logic.
$BREV this wave is indeed a bit interesting, as compliance platform endorsements are still rare in the ZK track. But it still depends on whether the project can truly be implemented; recognition on paper often differs significantly from actual progress.
I agree on the professional side, but you also need to learn how to distinguish who is truly professional. There are too many half-baked experts pretending to be professionals in the market.
Research work really needs to consult professionals; there are no shortcuts.
I've always believed that ability and professionalism determine how far a person can go in the industry. If you understand industry logic, study thoroughly, and accumulate enough experience, you can do well in anything. Conversely, if your foundation is not solid and your thinking is unclear, no matter how hard you try, it will be useless. Becoming a true insider requires time, practice, and continuous learning.
Additionally, this project has recently shown some movement— a leading compliant platform has included it in its listing roadmap, which is worth paying attention to in the ZK track. The project's progress and recognition have both improved.