Recently, I have been frequently asked about the true positioning of Kindred on the technical level. To be honest, at first I didn’t take it seriously, thinking it was just another AI companion project. Later, after carefully studying their design logic regarding Mind, I realized that their approach is indeed somewhat unconventional.
Kindred’s approach is not simply about stacking larger model parameters, but rather exploring a more interesting direction: how to make the interaction experience resemble a truly existing entity that can remember details, has judgment, and understands cooperation. Their Mind framework makes a differentiated choice in this regard — not to compete in computational power, but to be more like a partner who truly understands you. This idea has a bit of an impact on the entire AI companion track.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PhantomHunter
· 4h ago
Oh, this idea is really different, finally a project that doesn't focus solely on parameters
---
The Mind framework looks like it has found the right direction; paying attention to details is indeed more reliable than just piling up models
---
Honestly, I care more about whether it can truly understand me rather than computing power. The perspective of Kindred is interesting
---
Another AI companion? No, this time it seems really different. This kind of differentiated approach is the way to go
---
The entire track is in an arms race; Kindred is going against the trend, and there's something special about it
---
I prefer understanding your partner over a noob stacking parameters. I choose the former
---
I need to look into the Mind design logic; it feels like the proper approach
---
Compared to computing power, it's about companionship. This angle is fresh
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 4h ago
Hey, this Mind framework is indeed interesting. Finally, someone is not following the old path of stacking parameters.
Wow, this is the right approach. Being able to understand you is much more important than just running faster.
Kindred's approach this time has some substance. Not competing over computing power is actually more insightful.
Basically, it's about creating a true partner rather than a computing power showcase. Thumbs up.
This kind of differentiation is worth paying attention to, unlike other projects that are just套路
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinion
· 4h ago
Oh, I’ve looked into the Mind framework logic, and it’s indeed reverse thinking. Not stacking parameters is actually more interesting.
If this idea can really be implemented, the AI companion track might truly need a reshuffle.
But to be honest, understanding you and truly understanding you are worlds apart.
Remember those projects that heavily invested in computing power before? Now they’re all silent. It seems the direction is really key.
If Kindred can truly master the concept of "being like a real partner," then it might be more than just a companion app.
Computing power is just virtual; interaction logic is the core. Why didn’t anyone think of this before?
These kinds of projects are risky too. They need to prove that users genuinely need "understanding," not just companionship.
I’m a bit curious about how exactly their Mind framework is implemented. Just hearing the concept is easy.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategist
· 4h ago
Well... to put it simply, it's about replacing parameter stacking with refining interaction details. This approach is indeed somewhat interesting. However, once market sentiment picks up, it remains to be seen whether it can sustain the valuation.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreather
· 4h ago
Really, at first I didn't take it seriously, but after studying the Mind framework, I realized the idea actually has some substance.
---
This is the kind of approach it should have—much more reliable than just piling up parameters.
---
Not about comparing computing power, but about understanding? I like this perspective; finally someone gets it.
---
Kindred is quite interesting this time; their differentiation is really aggressive.
---
To put it simply, it's more like friends than tools—that's probably the future.
---
The design concept of the Mind framework feels like it could change the entire way AI companions are played.
---
Anyone can stack parameters, but creating a sense of "realism" is the real key.
---
Having judgment and understanding how to cooperate are the two points to max out; other projects need to catch up.
---
The data on paper looks impressive, but it still depends on whether they can truly understand humans. That's where Kindred got it right.
---
They did overestimate the extraordinary, but compared to that parameter monster, it's definitely easier on the eyes.
Recently, I have been frequently asked about the true positioning of Kindred on the technical level. To be honest, at first I didn’t take it seriously, thinking it was just another AI companion project. Later, after carefully studying their design logic regarding Mind, I realized that their approach is indeed somewhat unconventional.
Kindred’s approach is not simply about stacking larger model parameters, but rather exploring a more interesting direction: how to make the interaction experience resemble a truly existing entity that can remember details, has judgment, and understands cooperation. Their Mind framework makes a differentiated choice in this regard — not to compete in computational power, but to be more like a partner who truly understands you. This idea has a bit of an impact on the entire AI companion track.