There's been growing pushback over how the recent document releases have been handled. Critics point out a fundamental issue: the files that have been made public are only partial, and much of what's there comes heavily redacted. The real question people are asking—does this actually satisfy what the new law requires? On paper, compliance looks like a box being checked. In reality, when crucial information stays hidden behind black markers, stakeholders struggle to assess whether transparency obligations are genuinely being fulfilled. It raises eyebrows about whether releasing documents with that much material removed actually constitutes meaningful disclosure under the new regulatory framework.