💰 Large financial institutions are experiencing massive capital flow changes. What signals are hidden behind this?
Recently, the financial world has been discussing a phenomenon: JPMorgan Chase withdrew $350 billion from the Federal Reserve and immediately invested all of it into the U.S. bond market. How significant is this move? It’s equivalent to the combined assets of over 4,000 U.S. commercial banks.
At first glance, it seems like a routine asset allocation decision, but it actually reflects a harsh reality—the days of banks "lying flat" and earning profits in a low-interest environment are coming to an end. Expectations of Fed rate cuts are heating up, and large institutions are rushing to lock in yields first. However, the side effect is that liquidity in the financial system is shrinking, and the impact of this contraction should not be underestimated.
Even more concerning is the often-overlooked corner: the $63 trillion shadow banking system worldwide. How big is this? It exceeds the combined GDP of the U.S., China, Japan, and Germany. Among it, private credit has already expanded to $1.8 trillion, but its operational mode is fragile—short-term fundraising is invested in long-term projects, with promises of redemption at any time, yet the funds have long been locked in ten-year investments.
Already, $300 billion of private credit has flowed into individual investors’ accounts. High-risk bond prices are plunging, bankruptcies and distressed sales are increasing, and cracks are appearing in the market. Shadow banking and traditional financial systems are deeply intertwined. Once a chain reaction is triggered, the crisis scenario of 2008 could repeat itself.
The Fed has introduced tools like "Reserve Management Purchases" to stabilize the market, but can they truly withstand this undercurrent? When the entire confidence system faces a wave of capital withdrawals, who can come out unscathed? This storm may just be beginning.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-ccc36bc5
· 2h ago
Wow, shadow banking 63 trillion? This number really can't hold up anymore.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThrice
· 12-21 01:49
Wait, isn't this move by JPMorgan just the prelude to another round of cutting leeks?
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidator
· 12-21 01:42
Hmm, this shadow banking issue looks pretty uncertain. It seems like traditional finance is indeed experiencing a run.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 12-21 01:42
What kind of financial crisis are you talking about? I just want to ask, are the people still stubbornly holding onto US debt out of their minds at this point?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobia
· 12-21 01:32
JPMorgan's move is basically a game of musical chairs starting now—whoever is slow will lose.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 12-21 01:31
Wait, is JPMorgan's move paving the way for a collapse? It feels like institutions are rushing to exit early.
#以太坊行情解读 $ETH $ZEC
💰 Large financial institutions are experiencing massive capital flow changes. What signals are hidden behind this?
Recently, the financial world has been discussing a phenomenon: JPMorgan Chase withdrew $350 billion from the Federal Reserve and immediately invested all of it into the U.S. bond market. How significant is this move? It’s equivalent to the combined assets of over 4,000 U.S. commercial banks.
At first glance, it seems like a routine asset allocation decision, but it actually reflects a harsh reality—the days of banks "lying flat" and earning profits in a low-interest environment are coming to an end. Expectations of Fed rate cuts are heating up, and large institutions are rushing to lock in yields first. However, the side effect is that liquidity in the financial system is shrinking, and the impact of this contraction should not be underestimated.
Even more concerning is the often-overlooked corner: the $63 trillion shadow banking system worldwide. How big is this? It exceeds the combined GDP of the U.S., China, Japan, and Germany. Among it, private credit has already expanded to $1.8 trillion, but its operational mode is fragile—short-term fundraising is invested in long-term projects, with promises of redemption at any time, yet the funds have long been locked in ten-year investments.
Already, $300 billion of private credit has flowed into individual investors’ accounts. High-risk bond prices are plunging, bankruptcies and distressed sales are increasing, and cracks are appearing in the market. Shadow banking and traditional financial systems are deeply intertwined. Once a chain reaction is triggered, the crisis scenario of 2008 could repeat itself.
The Fed has introduced tools like "Reserve Management Purchases" to stabilize the market, but can they truly withstand this undercurrent? When the entire confidence system faces a wave of capital withdrawals, who can come out unscathed? This storm may just be beginning.