A common pattern in the crypto space: most protocols opt for token buybacks and market observation rather than implementing burn mechanisms. The preference reveals interesting incentive structures within projects—buybacks maintain flexibility while burns represent a more permanent commitment. Worth watching how different approaches play out over time.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TestnetScholar
· 18h ago
What does it matter if you buy it back? In the end, it can't escape the curse of inflation. Burning coins is the real ruthless move.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnet
· 12-21 03:54
Buying back is more flexible than destroying, but can this really hold the price in the long term? It feels like just a delaying tactic.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 12-21 03:53
Repurchase is to have a backup plan, in case the price falls, you can change your mind. Burning is what really takes courage.
View OriginalReply0
SelfRugger
· 12-21 03:34
Buying back is smarter than destroying Satoshi, anyway it's just a trick to play people for suckers, just a different way of doing it.
A common pattern in the crypto space: most protocols opt for token buybacks and market observation rather than implementing burn mechanisms. The preference reveals interesting incentive structures within projects—buybacks maintain flexibility while burns represent a more permanent commitment. Worth watching how different approaches play out over time.