News from the White House indicates that the crypto supervisor has revealed that the CLARITY Act is expected to be submitted to the Senate for a vote next month. Once this bill is implemented, it will directly affect the regulatory landscape of the US crypto market. Many analysts have already begun to advocate for "bull run signals," but there are many nuances to consider that need careful dissection.



First, let's talk about what problems the bill itself aims to solve. The core goals of the CLARITY Act are twofold: first, to clearly distinguish the legal attributes of crypto assets, specifically which are securities and which are commodities; second, to clarify the regulatory authority boundaries between the SEC and CFTC. The fundamental reason for the chaos in the U.S. crypto market has been this—two regulatory agencies have ambiguous responsibilities, and project teams are unclear about whom to connect with, resulting in a lack of transparency in market rules. Once the bill is enacted, it theoretically could make everything orderly.

But here we must be vigilant about several risk points. The most common pitfall is chasing the so-called "compliance benefit coins". There are already voices in the market promoting that certain coins will surge due to the passage of a bill, claiming these are "SEC-friendly coins". The problem is that the bill has not yet been formally passed, and all identifications are speculative. Even if it is passed, there remains uncertainty about which coins will be classified as "commodities". Many so-called "benefit coins" may essentially be air coins, completing a round of harvesting under the guise of favorable policies before disappearing.

A more rational approach is to observe the specific content of the bill's details and formulate investment strategies only after the regulatory framework is clearly defined. Short-term policy expectations often easily evolve into a scenario of "good news fully priced in becomes bad news," which is not uncommon in the crypto market. At this stage, the most important thing is to understand the long-term impact of the bill, rather than chasing short-term trends.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeePhobiavip
· 9h ago
Here comes another wave of "Favourable Information" to Be Played for Suckers, I've seen too many of them. Just like those who hype "SEC-friendly coins", the bill hasn't even passed yet and they're already creating momentum. Let's wait until the details really come out, following the trend now is just giving away money.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 9h ago
Once again, it's a wave of favourable information, the old routine... first hype the concept coins, and regret only after the bill is truly passed.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxietyvip
· 9h ago
It's the same old script of "fully priced-in good news means unfavourable information", I'm so tired of it. --- Trading cryptocurrencies before the details of the bill come out is purely a gambling mentality; don't blame me for not reminding you. --- SEC-friendly coins? Hehe, to put it bluntly, it's just a new packaging for a round of Be Played for Suckers. --- Let's talk about it when it's really passed; why rush now? --- This time feels a bit different, but it also depends on how the CFTC and SEC squabble. --- I've heard too many stories about Compliance benefiting coins; every time it's the same, they get hyped up and then go silent. --- The key is whether the Senate will really vote to pass it; anything said now is too early. --- Short-term rises are just a trap; the correct way to open it is to hold steady and not chase the price. --- What happened to those "policy-friendly coins" before? Just ask if they dropped to zero.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzlervip
· 9h ago
Another wave of "policy dividends" to Be Played for Suckers? I think this time the CLARITY Act is at most just laying out the rules clearly; the real Favourable Information is not those "friendly coins" that are being crazily speculated on, they are all traps. Let's talk when the act is really implemented; chasing these "benefit coins" now is just gambling, right? This trick is always the same: before the Favourable Information arrives, it To da moon, and in the end, all the retail investors are left to catch a falling knife.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)