#BinanceABCs The Truth About Digital Gold: The Funding Game Behind Bitcoin's Big Pump
From a few dollars all the way up to 88343.5 USDT, the rise of Bitcoin is indeed astonishing. But looking closely at this crazy curve, the logic behind it makes one wary - it is not much different from the classic game of passing the parcel.
Without the support of corporate cash flow, without the endorsement of the real economy, and without widespread real application scenarios, the price fluctuations of Bitcoin essentially come down to new money entering the market to fill the profits of older players. Early investors make money solely based on the funds of later entrants. Once new capital stops flowing in, the entire system will fall like a waterfall—historically, several crashes of Bitcoin have verified this rule.
Those claims about scarcity and decentralization sound cool, but to put it bluntly, they are just marketing packaging. No one cares how it fluctuates, there is no real market regulation, and prices are manipulated by institutions and large holders that possess a lot of tokens, leaving retail investors to follow passively. They rush in when it rises and get hurt when it falls. This is not investment; it is clearly a psychological game of who can run faster in the end. The stories of $BTC are essentially the same — the more holders there are, the harder it is to exit.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropSweaterFan
· 10h ago
It's the same old story again, but if you take a closer look, institutions are hoarding now. Isn't this the new game rule?
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 10h ago
It's the same old rhetoric again, but why don't you talk about how those early hodlers are doing now?
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTrader
· 10h ago
Here we go again with this trap? I've seen through it long ago, the saying "passing the buck" is spot on, it's just betting on the next fool being more foolish than you.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryer
· 10h ago
It's the same old spiel again... It was indeed profitable in the early days, but are those who enter now really being played for suckers, or is it all about their own insight? To be honest, I don't know either.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamer
· 11h ago
Haha, this logic, I thought the same three years ago... As a result, look, those who persisted until now are the ones laughing in the end. The game of passing the baton does exist, but in terms of cycles, history always repeats itself, only the participants have changed. It's true that retail investors get hurt, but who dares to look at it from a three or five-year perspective? How could those who entered early rely solely on the later participants? Someone has to believe in it. After this big dump, I still want to take a gamble on the rebound.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 11h ago
Here comes that trap again. It's not entirely wrong, but it's not completely right either. In the early days, it was indeed a game of passing the parcel, but it's very different now.
#BinanceABCs The Truth About Digital Gold: The Funding Game Behind Bitcoin's Big Pump
From a few dollars all the way up to 88343.5 USDT, the rise of Bitcoin is indeed astonishing. But looking closely at this crazy curve, the logic behind it makes one wary - it is not much different from the classic game of passing the parcel.
Without the support of corporate cash flow, without the endorsement of the real economy, and without widespread real application scenarios, the price fluctuations of Bitcoin essentially come down to new money entering the market to fill the profits of older players. Early investors make money solely based on the funds of later entrants. Once new capital stops flowing in, the entire system will fall like a waterfall—historically, several crashes of Bitcoin have verified this rule.
Those claims about scarcity and decentralization sound cool, but to put it bluntly, they are just marketing packaging. No one cares how it fluctuates, there is no real market regulation, and prices are manipulated by institutions and large holders that possess a lot of tokens, leaving retail investors to follow passively. They rush in when it rises and get hurt when it falls. This is not investment; it is clearly a psychological game of who can run faster in the end. The stories of $BTC are essentially the same — the more holders there are, the harder it is to exit.