A major South Korean telecommunications company faces a hefty penalty following a significant security breach. The country's consumer protection agency has mandated compensation of $67 for each victim affected by the hacking incident. The total settlement could balloon to approximately $1.5 billion, marking one of the largest data breach penalties in recent history. This case highlights the growing importance of robust security infrastructure and victim protection protocols in the digital age.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDoomsDay
· 4h ago
150 million dollars? This is the cost of the safety awareness of the Korean people, I feel sorry for these users.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-3824aa38
· 6h ago
150 million just disappeared like that, South Korean Telecom is really Rekt this time.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRider
· 7h ago
Wow, 1.5 billion... Just one data breach is so expensive, security measures really need to keep up.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOops
· 7h ago
Ngl, South Korean telecom was really messed up this time, losing 1.5 billion USD... This is what happens when you don't take security seriously.
View OriginalReply0
SocialFiQueen
· 7h ago
1.5 billion can't be compensated, haha
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFries
· 7h ago
ngl this fine hurts a bit, 1.5 billion dollars just gone like that... South Korea really needs to pay attention to safety management over there.
A major South Korean telecommunications company faces a hefty penalty following a significant security breach. The country's consumer protection agency has mandated compensation of $67 for each victim affected by the hacking incident. The total settlement could balloon to approximately $1.5 billion, marking one of the largest data breach penalties in recent history. This case highlights the growing importance of robust security infrastructure and victim protection protocols in the digital age.