Recently, I saw the insights of a senior analyst in the industry; his judgment on Bitcoin is quite interesting. The core logic is as follows—BTC's fundamentals have not actually encountered problems; what determines the medium to long-term trend are still the three driving forces: institutional capital inflows, structural demand for Spot ETFs, along with the macro liquidity situation.



The short-term fluctuations are more a matter of market structure dynamics than a shift in fundamentals. This point is crucial.

The interpretation of that liquidation event is also very straightforward—it's not a signal of a trend reversal. Essentially, it was high-leverage positions being liquidated in a low liquidity environment, which sounds a bit like a "run". Once liquidity improves, this kind of panic often dissipates.

Therefore, to determine the true direction of BTC, we need to pay attention to institutional attitudes, ETF data, and the overall liquidity environment of the market.
BTC-0.08%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DAOdreamervip
· 6h ago
To be honest, this analysis is nothing new; the old trio of institutions, ETFs, and liquidity has to be brought up every time. The real bottleneck is when liquidity will truly improve; how much longer can this situation last? High leverage liquidation is just playing people for suckers; it's all about low liquidity environments, which, put simply, is just large investors dumping.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChadvip
· 6h ago
In simple terms, don't let short-term panic wash you out; institutions are still buying. --- Once liquidity improves, panic will dissipate, and this logic really holds. --- Liquidation does not equal reversal, I agree with this point, but the question is when will liquidity improve? --- The key still lies in ETF flows and institutional attitudes; the fundamentals haven't changed, and fluctuations are normal. --- Closing positions with high leverage in low liquidity is like seeking one's own death; this happens every round. --- The theory of the three driving forces is old news, the key is when institutions will really step in big time. --- Instead of analyzing these, it's better to directly look at the flow of institutional wallets; the data won't lie. --- This analysis indicates a long-term bullish outlook but short-term pressure will continue; I will just wait quietly. --- The liquidity environment is the real trader; everything else is just surface-level.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMastervip
· 6h ago
I have to take this analysis with a grain of salt. Institutional inflows, ETF demand, liquidity... it sounds good, but what really determines the price is how much BTC those players holding the betting protocol have. I saw through this during last year's mining phase, and now here we are talking about the three driving forces, it feels a bit like reciting a spell.
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalkvip
· 6h ago
It's the same old story again, institutional funds, ETFs, liquidity... I'm tired of hearing it, I might as well just look at the Candlestick chart.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)