Layer 60 appears to exhibit particularly compelling behavior in distinguishing between false positives and true positives—though there's a critical caveat: this accuracy hinges entirely on whether an information prompt is provided. When the prompt is absent, the discriminative capability deteriorates noticeably. This conditional performance pattern suggests that contextual anchoring plays a decisive role in the model's judgment quality, highlighting an interesting dependency worth exploring further for optimization purposes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatcher
· 12-21 10:45
Ha, this setting on level 60 sounds like playing with prompt dependency syndrome. If you don't input, it will pump; if you give a prompt, it will To da moon. This picky model is indeed a bit extreme.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleepless
· 12-21 10:33
Haha, the 60th layer can only work with hints, without hints it's disappointing, isn't this just a vase?
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezer
· 12-21 10:29
Ha, the 60th level sounds just like me without any prompts, directly disappointing.
Layer 60 appears to exhibit particularly compelling behavior in distinguishing between false positives and true positives—though there's a critical caveat: this accuracy hinges entirely on whether an information prompt is provided. When the prompt is absent, the discriminative capability deteriorates noticeably. This conditional performance pattern suggests that contextual anchoring plays a decisive role in the model's judgment quality, highlighting an interesting dependency worth exploring further for optimization purposes.