Layer 60 appears to exhibit particularly compelling behavior in distinguishing between false positives and true positives—though there's a critical caveat: this accuracy hinges entirely on whether an information prompt is provided. When the prompt is absent, the discriminative capability deteriorates noticeably. This conditional performance pattern suggests that contextual anchoring plays a decisive role in the model's judgment quality, highlighting an interesting dependency worth exploring further for optimization purposes.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatchervip
· 12-21 10:45
Ha, this setting on level 60 sounds like playing with prompt dependency syndrome. If you don't input, it will pump; if you give a prompt, it will To da moon. This picky model is indeed a bit extreme.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleeplessvip
· 12-21 10:33
Haha, the 60th layer can only work with hints, without hints it's disappointing, isn't this just a vase?
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezervip
· 12-21 10:29
Ha, the 60th level sounds just like me without any prompts, directly disappointing.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)