The current entry cost is only one-third of the previous level. Isn't this rare consensus worth seizing? Regardless of domestic or international perspectives, the narrative recognition of this project is quite high. Leaders, it’s time for the community to truly unite. Everyone holding a share, that's how it should be. No more relying on plate-dividing speculation, that stuff is meaningless. To be honest, the number of active users on the ecological chain is already limited, so adding more pointless projects is unnecessary. Rather than fighting individually, it's better to focus our energy on this one worthy endeavor. This is the right path.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CounterIndicatorvip
· 11h ago
Here comes the trap again? You want me to go all in at one-third the price, huh?
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAOvip
· 11h ago
One-third of the price sounds really tempting, but it's always said like this... But speaking of which, can the community really unite? It often feels like everyone is fighting their own battles. Low cost doesn't mean someone will catch a falling knife, that's the key. I've heard this set of arguments too many times, it's just a different project name. It's easy to say, but who would really stake all their chips on one thing?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)