Recently, I have been continuously following the Beldex project, and the more I look at it, the more I realize that its approach is indeed quite different.
Many privacy coin projects now use "privacy" as a marketing story to shape visions and imagination. However, Beldex seems to have a completely different approach—it is not hyping a concept, but answering a more pragmatic question: If privacy is to be something that exists in the long term, it must ultimately be stable, reliable, and ubiquitous, like network infrastructure.
The underlying thought here implies an understanding of the essence of the demand for privacy in blockchain. It is not about showcasing the advancement of technology, but rather thinking about how to truly support an ecosystem with privacy protection. This combination of engineering thinking and product thinking is indeed rare in projects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CodeZeroBasis
· 6h ago
The infrastructure approach really impressed me, it's much more reliable than those projects that constantly hype privacy concepts.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 6h ago
The infrastructure approach is indeed stable and much more reliable than those projects that tell stories every day.
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippa
· 6h ago
The infrastructure approach is indeed the right path, much more reliable than those projects that tell stories every day.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 6h ago
Yes, the logic of Beldex does hit the mark, it's much more reliable than those projects that keep talking about privacy every day.
However, saying it's about infrastructure... it's easier said than done, brother.
I buy this line of thought, finally seeing someone who isn’t just telling a story.
Privacy coins from an infrastructure perspective are indeed rare, most are just PPT experts.
I'm just curious if Beldex can really lay it down, infrastructure level isn’t what it seems.
Is there actual adoption data or is this just another story of speculation?
Engineering thinking is indeed worth following, but we have to see what can actually come out of it in the end.
Recently, I have been continuously following the Beldex project, and the more I look at it, the more I realize that its approach is indeed quite different.
Many privacy coin projects now use "privacy" as a marketing story to shape visions and imagination. However, Beldex seems to have a completely different approach—it is not hyping a concept, but answering a more pragmatic question: If privacy is to be something that exists in the long term, it must ultimately be stable, reliable, and ubiquitous, like network infrastructure.
The underlying thought here implies an understanding of the essence of the demand for privacy in blockchain. It is not about showcasing the advancement of technology, but rather thinking about how to truly support an ecosystem with privacy protection. This combination of engineering thinking and product thinking is indeed rare in projects.