The LIGHT futures market is quite interesting this time. The subsidy with a negative rate of 2 directly offsets the transaction fees, and with a 50x leverage, the costs can basically break even before reaching a full position in a specific order. This setup is still attractive for short-term traders—no loss on fees, sufficient leverage; it just depends on whether you can hold on. Anyway, without the pressure of transaction fees, the psychological burden is much lighter. Is anyone trying this strategy?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FUDwatcher
· 4h ago
A negative 2 fee rate? Isn't that just the exchange subsidizing us to play? It feels a bit too sweet.
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamer
· 4h ago
Negative fee rates sound nice, but in reality, a 50x leverage is the real knife, and losses can accumulate extremely quickly.
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchain
· 4h ago
The negative fee rate trap is a bit harsh, but I think this kind of subsidy is often just a honeypot.
The LIGHT futures market is quite interesting this time. The subsidy with a negative rate of 2 directly offsets the transaction fees, and with a 50x leverage, the costs can basically break even before reaching a full position in a specific order. This setup is still attractive for short-term traders—no loss on fees, sufficient leverage; it just depends on whether you can hold on. Anyway, without the pressure of transaction fees, the psychological burden is much lighter. Is anyone trying this strategy?