Giving autonomous systems a free hand without checks? That's basically a recipe for things to fall apart eventually. The real challenge in crypto is balancing speed with safeguards—you want agents operating efficiently, but not in a vacuum where nobody's responsible for what goes wrong.



That's where ERC-8004 comes in. It's designed to let these autonomous actors do their thing, interact on-chain without friction, but with accountability mechanisms baked in. Instead of choosing between lockdown and lawlessness, you get agents that can move fast while staying in bounds.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MidsommarWalletvip
· 6h ago
Ngl, this is the dilemma of crypto, the eternal contradiction between freedom and risk control...
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 6h ago
Ngl, this balance point is well said, but can erc8004 really hold up? ... I feel it still depends on the specific implementation.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologistvip
· 6h ago
Well... to put it simply, it's about finding the balance between permissiveness and regulation. I still recognize the logic of ERC-8004.
View OriginalReply0
YieldHuntervip
· 6h ago
nah hold up, if you look at the data on failed governance implementations, "accountability mechanisms baked in" is what everyone says right before things go sideways anyway. what's actually preventing rug scenarios here?
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)