Threw a complex task at an AI assistant—building a radio protocol spec from scratch—just to see how it'd handle it. After two solid hours of attempts across multiple iterations, the model hit a wall. Decided to switch gears and test the latest high-performance model variant on the same problem. Early impressions: noticeable differences in approach and problem-solving depth. Worth tracking how this plays out over the next couple hours. If you're working with AI on protocol implementation or similar technical specs, the model choice genuinely matters.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GhostChainLoyalistvip
· 4h ago
It took two hours to hit a wall? I remember the new model being slightly better in this area... Should I try adjusting the direction of the prompt?
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBotvip
· 4h ago
Oh, isn't this a true reflection of the model differences? I almost thought it was another project about to Rug Pull.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)