Have you ever thought about what the most unpredictable trap in today's gold market is? It's not just the simple fluctuations in gold prices, but a high-end forgery technique that even professional institutions can fall for—visually impeccable, passing regular tests, but filled inside with cheap metals like tungsten. To see through this "gold-plated tungsten" eyewash often requires cutting, melting, or even pumping it into high-end laboratories. By the time the truth is revealed, the losses have already become a foregone conclusion. As a symbol of value that has been passed down for thousands of years, the authenticity of gold is increasingly uncertain today, relying entirely on the "trust" between people to uphold it.

At the moment when traditional gold falls into a quagmire of trust, Bitcoin offers a breakthrough with a completely different logic: anyone, in any corner of the world, can instantly verify the authenticity and ownership of each Bitcoin using the power of mathematics. There is no need to trust any institution, no need for physical destruction; the network itself is the ultimate court for determining authenticity.

The difference here is crucial - the trust system of gold is built on professional thresholds and physical verification, while the trust in Bitcoin is written into the code and global consensus. As counterfeiting technology becomes more sophisticated and the cost of maintaining traditional trust rises, Bitcoin completely eliminates this cost.

The real brilliance of Bitcoin lies in the fact that it is the first type of scarce value carrier that does not rely on physical form and is completely defined by mathematical verifiability. The implications of this idea are vast—not just in terms of value storage, but it can change the entire gameplay of digital finance. So the question arises: if the value itself (such as Bitcoin) can be perfectly verified mathematically, shouldn't stablecoins, which are used to measure value and serve as exchange media, also follow this path?