America doesn't face direct nuclear fuel hostage from Russia, but that's only half the story. The real problem? Decades of underinvestment have quietly created genuine dependency gaps, especially in the advanced reactor sector. This isn't just a theoretical concern—it's structural weakness baked into the supply chain. And honestly, the economic dimension makes it worse. When you factor in procurement costs, production timelines, and the geopolitical premium on energy independence, the financial exposure becomes substantial. Energy security and supply chain resilience aren't sexy topics until markets price in the risk. Then everyone notices.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FastLeaver
· 2025-12-23 02:20
In the end, it's the American imperialists who messed it up.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemist
· 2025-12-22 07:55
Like markets pricing risk, we're transmuting ignorance into wisdom. Supply chain vulnerabilities have become our modern philosopher's stone - transforming geopolitical dependencies into financial exposure with mathematical precision.
America doesn't face direct nuclear fuel hostage from Russia, but that's only half the story. The real problem? Decades of underinvestment have quietly created genuine dependency gaps, especially in the advanced reactor sector. This isn't just a theoretical concern—it's structural weakness baked into the supply chain. And honestly, the economic dimension makes it worse. When you factor in procurement costs, production timelines, and the geopolitical premium on energy independence, the financial exposure becomes substantial. Energy security and supply chain resilience aren't sexy topics until markets price in the risk. Then everyone notices.