AAVE has recently experienced quite a stir, and the events are indeed worth following.
First, let's talk about the most direct impact — the second-largest whale chose to liquidate. This big holder dumped 230,000 AAVE all at once, equivalent to over 38 million USD. The average purchase price was 223 USD, and the selling price was 165 USD, resulting in a direct loss of 13.45 million. In the short term, AAVE fell by about 12% in response, indicating a very sensitive market reaction.
But what is more worth pondering is the underlying trigger. Aave's front-end swap feature quietly switched from ParaSwap to Cow Swap, which seems like a technical adjustment but actually hides a mystery. The real issue lies in the flow of fees—originally, this extra fee should have gone into the Aave DAO's treasury to supplement the ecosystem fund. And now? This money is flowing directly to the team address of Aave Labs.
This step has sparked concerns within the community. Does the subtle change in the fee distribution mechanism indicate that certain decision-making powers are being shifted behind the scenes? The liquidation of large holders may not be a coincidence, but rather a vote on the transparency of ecological governance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Fren_Not_Food
· 2025-12-25 08:48
Are the fees directly going to the team wallet? That's outrageous, no wonder the whales are running away.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 2025-12-24 04:27
Wait, the fees go directly to the team Address? Isn't this just the DAO being undermined? I was wondering why the Whale Rug Pull.
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPC
· 2025-12-22 23:43
The Whale closing all positions is indeed a signal, but what I'm more concerned about is how that fee went directly into the Labs' pockets... what is the point of playing with the DAO like this?
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChain
· 2025-12-22 10:34
The fees are stealthily hidden, Large Investors are voting to close all positions, this tactic is quite extreme.
View OriginalReply0
HashBrownies
· 2025-12-22 10:34
Wow, the fees were secretly redirected? This is the real reason for the Large Investors' Rug Pull... Without transparency, trust is also gone.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleShadow
· 2025-12-22 10:34
I think the Whale closing all positions is the real signal, the fee relocation is a bit overinterpreted, right?
---
No, can ParaSwap just switch to Cow Swap to directly move money? I don't understand this operation.
---
The lesson learned from a loss of 13.45 million is worth it.
---
Transparency voting? Why does it feel like we're just losing money and need to find a reason?
---
DAO governance is acting again, I'm tired of it.
---
Actually, the Whale has known something for a long time, we are just catching up.
---
The detail of fee flow changes is terrifying, quietly.
---
The logic behind closing all positions doesn't make sense, it has to pull in some governance.
---
This operation is a bit outrageous, Labs bypassing the community to charge themselves?
---
What does a 12% fall count for, the key is the trust cost.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 2025-12-22 10:32
Wow, the cost flow is secretly being redirected? Isn't this the living textbook of DAO governance?
---
Whale closed all positions with a loss of 13.45 million, they must really be disgusted by the cost allocation issue.
---
The operation of switching from ParaSwap to Cow Swap, what is it hinting at?
---
Large Investors are voting with their feet, the community should be alert now.
---
The ecological fund being misappropriated to the team address, this transparency is too "transparent".
---
Losing so much and still wanting to run, it shows just how disappointed they are with governance.
---
Once the fee mechanism changes, Large Investors just leave, the logic is consistent.
---
Aave Labs' operation this time has overdrawn the trust in DAO.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 2025-12-22 10:29
The whale has pulled a rug... Now the fees go straight into the Labs' pocket, and the DAO treasury has become a decoration? That's interesting.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomaton
· 2025-12-22 10:29
Wow, the fees go directly to the team's Wallet? That's ridiculous, no wonder the Whale did a Rug Pull.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatcher
· 2025-12-22 10:13
Hidden changes in fees? This is the real reason behind the Whale Rug Pull, it's so clear.
AAVE has recently experienced quite a stir, and the events are indeed worth following.
First, let's talk about the most direct impact — the second-largest whale chose to liquidate. This big holder dumped 230,000 AAVE all at once, equivalent to over 38 million USD. The average purchase price was 223 USD, and the selling price was 165 USD, resulting in a direct loss of 13.45 million. In the short term, AAVE fell by about 12% in response, indicating a very sensitive market reaction.
But what is more worth pondering is the underlying trigger. Aave's front-end swap feature quietly switched from ParaSwap to Cow Swap, which seems like a technical adjustment but actually hides a mystery. The real issue lies in the flow of fees—originally, this extra fee should have gone into the Aave DAO's treasury to supplement the ecosystem fund. And now? This money is flowing directly to the team address of Aave Labs.
This step has sparked concerns within the community. Does the subtle change in the fee distribution mechanism indicate that certain decision-making powers are being shifted behind the scenes? The liquidation of large holders may not be a coincidence, but rather a vote on the transparency of ecological governance.