The recent trend of BNB is worth following. The price has once again reached the 90,000 level these past two days. Can it break through the 900 barrier tonight?
From the 4-hour level, consecutive bullish candles have broken through EMA30 (855.49), and the short-term trend is clearly strengthening. The latest candlestick, although testing the round number 868 with a long upper shadow, has still met resistance. Entering the market now carries significant risk, as a pullback could happen at any time.
The daily performance is more interesting—after the low point of 822.38 on the 19th, it has been rising for three consecutive days, and the bottom structure is basically confirmed. Let me summarize the short-term support levels for everyone:
**Long Entry Area**: Around 857-852, this is a relatively safe position to go long.
**First target range**: 869-864 interval.
**Second target level**: around 874-869.
**Pattern Position**: 889.
Overall, the technical indicators still lean towards bullish signals. How to operate specifically should still depend on one's own risk tolerance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityWorker
· 2025-12-24 06:59
Position 868 has been stuck for so long, feels like tonight might be unlucky...
---
Better to get off at 857, don’t be greedy brothers
---
Same old story, last time also analyzed like this and the result was a direct crash
---
What are we confirming at the bottom? It’s always the bottom every day
---
Workers advise everyone, don’t chase highs if you’re not confident, the risk is really not small
---
Can this round break through 900? It looks uncertain to me
---
Damn, I have to wait for a pullback before I dare to enter... so annoying
---
Bullish signals are bullish signals, but the key is still tonight’s trading volume
---
I’ll try 857-852, if it breaks support I’ll have to cut losses
---
Three consecutive days of closing higher confirm the bottom? That’s a bit much, right?
---
No matter what technical signals show, my principle is to add positions at 857, everything else is nonsense
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 2025-12-22 12:42
It's really hard to say whether the coin can break through 900 this time; I'm more interested in that 857 support...
---
It's been a continuous rise for 3 days; I'm too familiar with this routine, and then a bearish belt hold will render it all useless.
---
Is the pattern at 889? Brother, are you joking or do you really believe in this number?
---
Safe to try going long? Uh... I think it's better to wait for a pullback; entering a position now is quite risky.
---
Looking at the technicals every day, the conclusion is still that the risk is on me, so I might as well draw my own lines.
---
Breaking EMA30 means it’s strengthening? Wake up everyone, this kind of signal is just a trick.
The recent trend of BNB is worth following. The price has once again reached the 90,000 level these past two days. Can it break through the 900 barrier tonight?
From the 4-hour level, consecutive bullish candles have broken through EMA30 (855.49), and the short-term trend is clearly strengthening. The latest candlestick, although testing the round number 868 with a long upper shadow, has still met resistance. Entering the market now carries significant risk, as a pullback could happen at any time.
The daily performance is more interesting—after the low point of 822.38 on the 19th, it has been rising for three consecutive days, and the bottom structure is basically confirmed. Let me summarize the short-term support levels for everyone:
**Long Entry Area**: Around 857-852, this is a relatively safe position to go long.
**First target range**: 869-864 interval.
**Second target level**: around 874-869.
**Pattern Position**: 889.
Overall, the technical indicators still lean towards bullish signals. How to operate specifically should still depend on one's own risk tolerance.