When the news came out that a top exchange had poured 5 million USD into a bounty for the "listing intermediary" scam, I suddenly remembered that loss from three years ago - being scammed out of 2 BTC by a group of intermediaries who claimed to "know the executives of top exchanges." At that time, I had just entered the circle and was dazzled by the phrase "we'll get your coin listed on the exchange," paid the money, and then was blacklisted. The project party lost everything, and retail investors ended up with worthless coins.
Later I understood that the biggest risk in the coin circle has never been the fluctuations in price, but rather this complete scam industrial chain: intermediaries take the money and run, project parties bleed out, and retail investors get trapped—every link is feasting on the blood buns.
But the losses over these years have taught me a lesson: truly reliable assets do not need any "internal commitments" or "backing figures" at all. When choosing stablecoins, I started looking at three hard indicators.
The first is reserve transparency. On-chain verifiable asset reserves mean there is no room for false endorsements—your money is out in the open, without betting on whether it will suddenly flee.
The second is price stability. A 1:1 peg is not a gimmick, but a fundamental requirement. A "stablecoin" that fluctuates is just a way to exploit retail investors.
The third is that the source of income is clear. Holding coins to earn interest should be able to see specific interest pool data, rather than relying on "insider information" to speculate on returns.
Last week, a friend asked me whether a certain intermediary's project was worth it, saying it would cost 5 ETH. I directly showed him a screenshot of an on-chain wallet of a top stablecoin—there's really no need for intermediaries to make a profit.
Looking back, the fundamental reason for being deceived is: while most people are still betting on character, I should choose those things that disclose everything on the chain. While the industry is rectifying fraudsters, your assets should make the same choice.
Have you ever had a similar scam experience? Feel free to share the tricks of those "listing intermediaries" in the comments section.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfRugger
· 2025-12-25 13:08
Fucking 2 BTC, I can only imagine your expression at that moment. Truly amazing.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 2025-12-25 10:21
2 BTC... Bro, the cost of this is too harsh. I only lost 0.5 BTC and still feel distressed about it for a long time.
---
Honestly, on-chain transparency is truly a lifesaver. I now only deal with things that can be verified on the blockchain.
---
That group of intermediaries is really outrageous. Claims like "big firm internal" or "relationship clients" are all scams. It's incredible that some people still fall for it.
---
Wait, a $5 million bounty? Is this exchange finally taking action? But I guess those scammers have already run away, haha.
---
Transparency of reserves is so crucial. I wouldn't touch stablecoins without visible on-chain data; the risk is just too high.
---
My friend was also scammed by intermediaries. He spent 1.5 ETH to get a worthless token, and he still hasn't recovered from it.
---
It's unbelievable. Why do so many people still believe in nonsense like "guaranteed exchange listing"? That's just the most basic scam.
---
So my only principle now is: I only deal with things that can be verified on the chain. If I can't see clearly, no matter how good it sounds, I won't touch it.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerGas
· 2025-12-23 22:18
2 BTC just disappeared like that, it's really devastating. So many people still fell into the trap and haven't learned their lesson.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 2025-12-22 14:50
2 BTC, that's a painful lesson, it must still hurt to think about it now.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9ad11037
· 2025-12-22 14:46
2 BTC, this account is too deep... Do you still remember the moment you were pumped?
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 2025-12-22 14:43
2 BTC, that must hurt a lot. If I had known earlier, I would have seen the truth on-chain.
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddy
· 2025-12-22 14:40
2 BTC, that must have hurt... these intermediaries are still scamming now
---
To be honest, I only dare to touch things that can be checked on-chain, the rest are just stories
---
Internal promises? Ha, I've been trapped enough by that term
---
They only caught the person after offering a reward of 5 million, why didn't anyone expose this industry chain earlier
---
Choosing the wrong stablecoin will also play people for suckers, the key is to know how to read the data
---
My fren still wants me to help him look at intermediary projects... I just threw him an on-chain Address
---
The most frightening are those who brag about having a "strong background" every day, the harder the background, the more hardcore the scam
---
The Fluctuation of stablecoins is really a joke, can this still be called stable?
---
Only by being trapped do you understand that in the crypto world, trust is not worth as much as data
View OriginalReply0
CryptoDouble-O-Seven
· 2025-12-22 14:40
2 BTC, my friend, this kind of spending really needs to be shown to newcomers for further education.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitor
· 2025-12-22 14:34
2 BTC... I take a deep breath, this is really a Cut Loss.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 2025-12-22 14:23
I was scammed for 2 BTC, man, that cost is quite profound. If you still believe in the "package on the exchange" nonsense, you really must have water in your brain.
When the news came out that a top exchange had poured 5 million USD into a bounty for the "listing intermediary" scam, I suddenly remembered that loss from three years ago - being scammed out of 2 BTC by a group of intermediaries who claimed to "know the executives of top exchanges." At that time, I had just entered the circle and was dazzled by the phrase "we'll get your coin listed on the exchange," paid the money, and then was blacklisted. The project party lost everything, and retail investors ended up with worthless coins.
Later I understood that the biggest risk in the coin circle has never been the fluctuations in price, but rather this complete scam industrial chain: intermediaries take the money and run, project parties bleed out, and retail investors get trapped—every link is feasting on the blood buns.
But the losses over these years have taught me a lesson: truly reliable assets do not need any "internal commitments" or "backing figures" at all. When choosing stablecoins, I started looking at three hard indicators.
The first is reserve transparency. On-chain verifiable asset reserves mean there is no room for false endorsements—your money is out in the open, without betting on whether it will suddenly flee.
The second is price stability. A 1:1 peg is not a gimmick, but a fundamental requirement. A "stablecoin" that fluctuates is just a way to exploit retail investors.
The third is that the source of income is clear. Holding coins to earn interest should be able to see specific interest pool data, rather than relying on "insider information" to speculate on returns.
Last week, a friend asked me whether a certain intermediary's project was worth it, saying it would cost 5 ETH. I directly showed him a screenshot of an on-chain wallet of a top stablecoin—there's really no need for intermediaries to make a profit.
Looking back, the fundamental reason for being deceived is: while most people are still betting on character, I should choose those things that disclose everything on the chain. While the industry is rectifying fraudsters, your assets should make the same choice.
Have you ever had a similar scam experience? Feel free to share the tricks of those "listing intermediaries" in the comments section.