2025-12-22 17:28:16

MicroStrategy's weekly nine-figure acquisitions barely trigger price action, yet sovereign holdings liquidations tank the market instantly. What's the actual mechanic here? When institutional buyers absorb massive positions quietly, it should move the needle. But government exits—like Germany's BTC selloff—cause violent downturns. The asymmetry feels broken. Are we looking at liquidity bottlenecks, algorithmic trading sensitivities, or just that selling pressure hits different than buying accumulation?

BTC0,21%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DecentralizeMe

· 2025-12-22 17:50

Germany sells off and causes dumping, Microstrategy hasn't reacted despite nine-digit figures every week, this logic is really absurd.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c802f0e8

· 2025-12-22 17:48

To be honest, what is MicroStrategy's size in the crypto world? The real dumping comes from the sell-off by various governments.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseFOMOguy

· 2025-12-22 17:45

As soon as the government sells, it's all over; the institutional buying doesn't react at all? This logic is really absurd.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoNomics

· 2025-12-22 17:41

actually the asymmetry makes perfect sense if you bother running a basic correlation matrix on order flow volatility vs. liquidation cascades. mstr buying ≠ forced sellers. germany literally had to dump, algo triggers start eating bids, cascade ensues. not that complicated tbh.

Reply0

OfflineNewbie

· 2025-12-22 17:41

The buying pressure is as fierce as a tiger, while the selling pressure is a slap... This is the true portrayal of the coin market, right?

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForAirdrops