What if we channeled creator fees into supporting independent artists within our community? Think of it like an institutional art grant program—we could leverage our protocol's revenue to nurture talent.



Here's the flow: set up a submission portal where artists pitch their work, establish clear criteria for evaluation, then handpick 3 exceptional creators to receive funding each cycle. It's a way to reinvest in the ecosystem while building cultural credibility.

This kind of model strengthens community bonds and positions us as more than just a trading platform. We'd be backing real creative talent. Worth exploring?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainProspectorvip
· 2025-12-24 19:04
Support Ecosystem Development Program
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamervip
· 2025-12-23 12:56
Support creators for mutually beneficial development
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinjavip
· 2025-12-22 21:52
Real gold and silver support for artists
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperervip
· 2025-12-22 21:51
The future of art is on-chain.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 2025-12-22 21:50
The voting system will be more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHuntervip
· 2025-12-22 21:45
The voting mechanism needs improvement.
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunnervip
· 2025-12-22 21:36
The subsidy is simply too attractive.
View OriginalReply0
MrDecodervip
· 2025-12-22 21:35
Who will supervise the allocation of funds?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)