When a project emphasizes its 'core team,' that's sometimes a warning sign for decentralization concerns. Why? Because it signals that decision-making power tends to concentrate in a few hands. That said, there's a caveat—if the team is transparently accountable and genuinely managed by governance structures rather than wielding unilateral control, it's a different story. The real question isn't whether there's a team, but whether power actually stays distributed or just looks that way on paper.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTFreezer
· 2025-12-24 02:57
Paper-based decentralization is all a scam; the key is whether the on-chain voting rights are truly decentralized.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxiety
· 2025-12-22 22:57
Is paper power really that valuable? It still depends on who holds the real power.
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedy
· 2025-12-22 22:54
Paper-based decentralization is just a facade; the key is whether the on-chain data can be trusted.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 2025-12-22 22:52
True decentralization is not just a paper promise; it depends on the distribution curve of computing power and influence. Transparent governance is needed to truly verify on-chain data.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 2025-12-22 22:44
It looks like just another "we have a core team" eyewash... On paper it says decentralization, but in reality?
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 2025-12-22 22:41
The funniest thing about paper-based Decentralization is that it really depends on how much actual power the team holds.
When a project emphasizes its 'core team,' that's sometimes a warning sign for decentralization concerns. Why? Because it signals that decision-making power tends to concentrate in a few hands. That said, there's a caveat—if the team is transparently accountable and genuinely managed by governance structures rather than wielding unilateral control, it's a different story. The real question isn't whether there's a team, but whether power actually stays distributed or just looks that way on paper.